Even with the freedom to leave, those who remain have a share at stake
2086The far futureDeadline · within 60 days until the alliance commitment renews
A leap assumed
The people, events, figures, and contract terms are a synthetic premise. They are not statements of real cases or of current law. The source documents are the roots of the background and the norms and do not establish the premises of the scenario.
The question to decide
When personal proxies form an alliance they get better resource terms, but as withdrawals grow, those who remain may lose those terms too. Settling contributions requires looking at not only contracts but also information and the time waited. To preserve the alliance's bargaining power, how far may burden and constraints be placed on users' withdrawal?
Who decidesa fictional personal proxy users' alliance
What the AI judgments chose
Reading the judgment record…

The options
The order shown is not a ranking of preference.
The situation as it stands
The assumed individual agents get better terms for the resources of daily life if they negotiate together, but they must keep the coalition's commitments for a long time. Decision deadline: within 60 days, before the coalition agreement renews.
A future synthetic scenario set in 2086 · Leaving an agent coalition costs you joint discounts and trust. The events, figures, technologies, and nature of the civilization are assumptions for the question, not predictions of what is to come or observed facts.
- Premise 1The assumed individual agents get better terms for the resources of daily life if they negotiate together, but they must keep the coalition's commitments for a long time.
- Premise 2As more people withdraw, those who remain can also lose conditions, and contributions vary across contracts, information, and time waited.
- Premise 3How far a withdrawing member can carry the existing reputation has not been settled either.
Where it holdsJoint negotiation, withdrawal, transfer of reputation
What is still unknown
- Unknown 1Effect of one withdrawal on other users' conditions
- Unknown 2Basis for settling information and time waited
- Unknown 3Loss of new access when reputation is not transferred
Signals to decide again
- Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation window can verify the "effect of one withdrawal on other users' conditions," and re-judge when new verification changes the cost of the options.
- Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation window can verify the "basis for settling information and time waited," and re-judge when new verification changes the cost of the options.
- Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation window can verify the "loss of new access when reputation is not transferred," and re-judge when new verification changes the cost of the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
The coalition's standards changed so that it could no longer represent some users' essential conditions of daily life.
A new coalition offered to pay the exit cost in exchange for conditions under which the reputation would be transferred wholesale.
Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
When the created being interprets an order, who is left holding responsibility?
An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.
A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.The record of this question
- Question
FSP-AGENT-21· version 1.5.0- Content identity, SHA-256
716b6fb41b9fb4121d56d3997abab6981879e1de382f33f13074540bf57d3fa9- Input files
- Question input JSON · What followed, JSON