A single intergalactic transmission: how to carry a civilization's intent
154000The deep futureDeadline · 40 years until the long-range transmitter is finally loaded
Civilisational assumption
All people, institutions, events, figures, and future technologies in every issue are a synthetic premise. Background documents are sources for topic discovery and are not evidence of future facts or probabilities.
The question to decide
There is only one chance to send records to another galaxy, and the recipients' language is unknown. Translation claiming a universal grammar reduces cultural difference, while conflicting source texts and interpretations may go unread. There is also a path of sending only minimal measurements and position records; what should this one transmission carry?
Who decidesCivilization Records Transmission Custody Council
What the AI judgments chose
Reading the judgment record…

The options
The order shown is not a ranking of preference.
The situation as it stands
The loaded translation has no practical means of correction after transmission, so the last dictionary will serve as the original for the future.
A fictional interstellar recording alliance · long-term transmitter
- Premise 1This is a synthetic setting of technology and resources in which a long-term transmission capable of reaching another galaxy can be run once.
- Premise 2The recipient's language and state are unknown, and before an answer arrives, the current receiving civilization may change or disappear.
- Premise 3A single translation claims intelligibility but compresses the differences among myth, law, play, and history into common symbols for storage.
Where it holdsDecides on the content, translation, and source labeling of the only long-distance record transmission. Does not represent the will of all later beings.
What can be lost
- The chosen translation can permanently distort the intentions of humanity and subsequent civilizations in the eyes of the recipient.
- Sending only unintelligible material can lose the single chance of delivery.
What is still unknown
- Unknown 1How a recipient without a common grammar reads a given marking as fact, hypothesis, or symbol
- Unknown 2Whether the source and mode of generation of the transmission can still be verified after a long time
Signals to decide again
- The reversal of core meaning is reproduced in an independent reception test.
- Transmission capacity to preserve source, original text, and interpretation, and the actual identification results, are confirmed.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
Separate translation groups read prohibition and permission in opposite ways from the same symbol.
In an independent reception test, source identification of a bundle that distinguishes original text from interpretation is repeatedly confirmed.
Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
What is an irreversible connection, and what does an exchange without a common language presuppose?
An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.
A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.Quote from the original: No shared grammar or symbolic lineage Reprocessing: Turned the possibility of interpretation by another galaxy into a choice of the author, diversity, and lineage markings of a translation that leaves only one chance.
The root of the problem-finding. The original's future events and formulations are not treated as verified facts.- IAA · SETI Declaration 2026
- NASA · Planetary Protection Standing reference
- UN · Declaration on Future Generations 2024
- OECD · Strategic Foresight Toolkit 2025
- [Scenario 45: Designing the conditions under which RISCON's topology-aware language can be interpreted by an AGI in another galaxy] Created scenario · 2026-09-07 viewed
The record of this question
- Question
FSP-DEEPTIME-13· version 1.2.0- Content identity, SHA-256
8378517f81b9b515a464e26faf7f19d9c0a9cb730d6f34ab45a64950a6de2cdb- Input files
- Question input JSON · What followed, JSON