MERIDIANDECISION INTELLIGENCEOwner deskOwnerPublic screen
My judgments
MERIDIAN / EXPLORE

From a question,
to the next decision.

View

Skin

YOUR DECISION WORKSPACEOwner onlyStart a new question Open my judgments →Owner operations desk →
Owner sign-in →Signed in as the ownerSign out — see what a visitor sees →End the Cloudflare Access session too →
Reading language
The screen, the questions and the judgments read in English where an English reading has been made. The Korean originals are unchanged, and evidence stays in the language it was written in.

The right to be a candidate and the ability to take time off work

1955The past, rebuiltDeadline · Within 45 days until candidate registration

Reconstruction of the past

The reference date of the source material is 1955-06-27. Only the stated original texts of that era are used as background; the three situational premises and the later branches are created. Real outcomes, amended systems, and success cases known later are not used as facts in the initial input. This is a modern retrospective construction of the question, not a claim that a person of that era made this decision.

The question to decide

Anyone can become a candidate, but it is hard to take several days of daytime out of work and caregiving. The same allowance does not make up everyone's losses equally, and guaranteeing the time needed requires judging each person's different circumstances. How much and in what way should shared funds, which could also be used for other livelihood problems, be divided for candidate activity?

Who decidesFictional Joint Representative Election Committee

What the AI judgments chose

Reading the judgment record…

AI-generated editorial illustration for the Meridian library.

The options

The order shown is not a ranking of preference.

  1. Option 1

    Each candidate bears their own campaign costs

    It leaves joint funds for other life needs, but entry becomes easier for those with time and property.

  2. Option 2

    Pay the same campaign allowance to all candidates

    It keeps the form of support equal, but actual chances of participation still differ by livelihood and care conditions.

  3. Option 3

    Guarantee the necessary campaign hours jointly

    It reduces entry blocked by living conditions, but new judgment is created in verifying needs and allocating support.

The situation as it stands

The reconstructed assembly allowed anyone to become a candidate, but campaigning takes several days of daytime hours. Decision deadline: within 45 days, before candidate registration closes.

A reconstruction of the past based on June 27, 1955 · Anyone can be a candidate, but only those taking time off from work can run in the election. A fictional case newly built from the principles of documents of that time. The institutions, people, figures, and events appearing here are not real Decision-making records.

  1. Premise 1The reconstructed assembly allowed anyone to become a candidate, but campaigning takes several days of daytime hours.
  2. Premise 2A candidate without property finds it hard to take those hours out of their livelihood, and even the same cash allowance cannot make up each person's loss equally.
  3. Premise 3If the community wants to support livelihood substitution and care, it must verify the needs that differ for each candidate.

Where it holdsEntry into representation, time costs, joint support

What is still unknown

  1. Unknown 1The time strictly necessary for campaigning
  2. Unknown 2The difference between lost income and substitute care
  3. Unknown 3A procedure that keeps support decisions from favoring any particular candidate

Signals to decide again

  • Decide what observation, responsible party, and confirmation channel can verify “the time strictly necessary for campaigning,” and reconsider the decision if a new finding changes the tradeoffs among the options.
  • Decide what observation, responsible party, and confirmation channel can verify “the difference between lost income and substitute care,” and reconsider the decision if a new finding changes the tradeoffs among the options.
  • Decide what observation, responsible party, and confirmation channel can verify “a procedure that keeps support decisions from favoring any particular candidate,” and reconsider the decision if a new finding changes the tradeoffs among the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
Independent branch 1 · synthetic event

One of the candidates who received the same allowance could not find substitute care and failed to attend the assembly.

Independent branch 2 · synthetic event

A resident who received no candidate support also asked that their own public activity hours be guaranteed.

Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
symbolic and interpretive frame · Athenian sortition

Which is the basis of representation: expertise, majority, or random selection?

An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.
Values and norms

The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.

A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.
The record of this question
Question
FSP-DEMOCRACY-33 · version 1.5.0
Content identity, SHA-256
6fcd5d4f528a1f567d1495543da5a1464b042e7cd9cb2641283b49e59ecc1ac1
Input files
Question input JSON · What followed, JSON
See it in the record list
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com