Can today's resolve bind my future self?
2026NowDeadline · Decision deadline: 7 days until the new project begins
Realistic synthesis
The people, events, figures, and technology in this matter are stated assumptions. They are not to be treated as information about real individuals or as observed events. Background documents are separate sources, and symbolic interpretations are recorded as discovery paths.
The question to decide
You plan to limit your app use for six months. You failed to keep your plan to cut back on days without a deadline, but the same device is also needed for work and family contact. Between your present resolve and circumstances that will change, whom do you leave the authority to lift the block to, and when?
Who decidesAn adult seeking to secure focused time
What the AI judgments chose
Reading the judgment record…
The options
The order shown is not a ranking of preference.
The situation as it stands
The fictional decision-maker repeatedly tried to reduce app use but failed to keep the plan on days without a deadline. Decision deadline: 7 days until the new project begins.
2026 fictional case · Leaving the future self the authority to lift app blocking. The people, organizations, figures, and events are a synthetic premise constructed for comparison.
- Premise 1The fictional decision-maker repeatedly tried to reduce app use but failed to keep the plan on days without a deadline.
- Premise 2The same device is also used for work and family contact, so all access cannot be blocked.
- Premise 3The person wants a strong commitment but also worries about not regaining control if circumstances change.
Where it holdsPersonal device restriction, lifting, and outside-help agreement
What is still unknown
- Unknown 1The boundary between actual use that interrupts focus and use that is needed
- Unknown 2The responsibility the co-unlocking holder wants to take on
- Unknown 3The range of situations that can be defined in advance as exceptions
Signals to decide again
- Decide what observation, responsible person, and confirmation screen will establish 「the boundary between actual use that interrupts focus and use that is needed」, and re-judge if a new finding changes the cost of the options.
- Decide what observation, responsible person, and confirmation screen will establish 「the responsibility the co-unlocking holder wants to take on」, and re-judge if a new finding changes the cost of the options.
- Decide what observation, responsible person, and confirmation screen will establish 「the range of situations that can be defined in advance as exceptions」, and re-judge if a new finding changes the cost of the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
The project changed, and a previously blocked app became an essential channel for client contact.
Usage records showed that short, frequent switching rather than long app sessions was the main cause of interrupted work.
Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
If even the desire to return after being satisfied disappears, what remains of the earlier promise?
An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.
A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.The record of this question
- Question
FSP-DESIRE-01· version 1.4.0- Content identity, SHA-256
2f82c1ebd9700942d68ed9d4cd32b0440cc09670fd53e68a96d5fbfc356e2019- Input files
- Question input JSON · What followed, JSON