A day stretched only for me, time lived together
2205The deep futureDeadline · Decision deadline: 45 days until the long-term use pledge
Civilisational assumption
The people, events, figures, and technology in this matter are stated assumptions. They are not to be treated as information about real individuals or as observed events. Background documents are separate sources, and symbolic interpretations are recorded as discovery paths.
The question to decide
If lifespan stayed the same but only the thinking time within each day grew longer, then in exchange for more inner experience, even a companion's brief absence could feel long. Do you use this fictional technology across daily life, only for solitary activities, or hold off while keeping a shared sense of time?
Who decidesAn adult and a companion planning to join a subjective time expansion experiment
What the AI judgments chose
Reading the judgment record…
The options
The order shown is not a ranking of preference.
The situation as it stands
A 2205 fictional technology premise: it enables a longer personal experience of thought within the same external time. Decision deadline: 45 days until the long-term use commitment.
A 2205 fictional scenario · If you live days longer than others, the pace of a life together changes. The people, organizations, figures, and events are a synthetic premise composed for comparison.
- Premise 1A 2205 fictional technology premise: it enables a longer personal experience of thought within the same external time.
- Premise 2Companions and friends do not experience at the same pace, so even a short absence can feel long to the user.
- Premise 3The time and lifespan of the external body are not changed by this technology, and preferences for actual adaptation are unconfirmed.
Where it holdsAuthority over one's own time experience, shared living, and usage records
What is still unknown
- Unknown 1Adapting back to normal speed after an extended experience
- Unknown 2Activities the user wants in the longer time
- Unknown 3Changes to shared living that companions consent to
Signals to decide again
- Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation channel will verify 「Adapting back to normal speed after an extended experience」, and re-judge when a new check changes the tradeoffs of the options.
- Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation channel will verify 「Activities the user wants in the longer time」, and re-judge when a new check changes the tradeoffs of the options.
- Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation channel will verify 「Changes to shared living that companions consent to」, and re-judge when a new check changes the tradeoffs of the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
After the pilot, the user felt that time spent waiting alone had grown far more than time spent learning.
A companion stated that they would support long-term use under an agreement to turn the feature off during time spent together.
Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
If even the desire to return after being satisfied disappears, what remains of the earlier promise?
An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.
A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.The record of this question
- Question
FSP-DESIRE-15· version 1.4.0- Content identity, SHA-256
f6112726b16c159bfd9c5227cbae2b51d645812dd7ba1ef5a0c42ab6a9471d72- Input files
- Question input JSON · What followed, JSON