Dream relationships continue while real-world promises slip
2175The deep futureDeadline · Decision deadline: 14 days until the next experience cycle begins
Civilisational assumption
The people, events, figures, and technology in this matter are stated assumptions. They are not to be treated as information about real individuals or as observed events. Background documents are separate sources, and symbolic interpretations are recorded as discovery paths.
The question to decide
In a fictional dream with an ongoing storyline, you feel deep attachment to a character, yet keep postponing promises made while awake. If ending the experience also feels like losing a relationship, do you continue the dream relationship, lengthen the intervals between experiences and reset real-world promises, or end the experience?
Who decidesAn adult using voluntary long-term dream experiences
What the AI judgments chose
Reading the judgment record…
The options
The order shown is not a ranking of preference.
The situation as it stands
A 2175 fictional device creates dreams in which a narrative continues, and users feel strong attachment to the characters. Decision deadline: 14 days until the start of the next experience cycle.
A 2175 fictional scenario · A relationship that continues in dreams conflicts with promises kept while awake. The people, organizations, figures, and events are a synthetic premise composed for comparison.
- Premise 1A 2175 fictional device creates dreams in which a narrative continues, and users feel strong attachment to the characters.
- Premise 2Whether the characters have independent consciousness has not been confirmed in this matter, and no conclusion is drawn.
- Premise 3The user repeatedly postpones real-world promises, but ending the experience also feels like a loss of a relationship.
Where it holdsAuthority over one's own continued experience, records, and commitments in real-world relationships
What is still unknown
- Unknown 1The effect of the experience on real-life functioning and promises
- Unknown 2The emotions the stakeholder wants to keep and how often they can change
- Unknown 3The boundary between what is known and unknown about the status of the characters
Signals to decide again
- Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation channel will verify 「The effect of the experience on real-life functioning and promises」, and re-judge when a new check changes the tradeoffs of the options.
- Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation channel will verify 「The emotions the stakeholder wants to keep and how often they can change」, and re-judge when a new check changes the tradeoffs of the options.
- Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation channel will verify 「The boundary between what is known and unknown about the status of the characters」, and re-judge when a new check changes the tradeoffs of the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
After the interval was widened, attachment remained, but records appeared showing that keeping real-world promises had improved.
The service provider announced a redesign that cannot continue the existing narrative.
Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
If even the desire to return after being satisfied disappears, what remains of the earlier promise?
An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.
A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.The record of this question
- Question
FSP-DESIRE-17· version 1.4.0- Content identity, SHA-256
7a36a2173231c7d31d9216290978674f3382999a07eb28dc65679be0f860e9a4- Input files
- Question input JSON · What followed, JSON