MERIDIANDECISION INTELLIGENCEOwner deskOwnerPublic screen
My judgments
MERIDIAN / EXPLORE

From a question,
to the next decision.

View

Skin

YOUR DECISION WORKSPACEOwner onlyStart a new question Open my judgments →Owner operations desk →
Owner sign-in →Signed in as the ownerSign out — see what a visitor sees →End the Cloudflare Access session too →
Reading language
The screen, the questions and the judgments read in English where an English reading has been made. The Korean originals are unchanged, and evidence stays in the language it was written in.

Reading is free, revising is not

2019The past, rebuiltDeadline · Within 60 days, before the new materials agreement

Reconstruction of the past

The date of the source material is 2019-11-26. Only the stated texts of that period are used as background; the three situational premises and the later branching are invented. Actual outcomes later known, amended systems, or success stories are not used as facts in the initial input. This is a modern retrospective question construction, not a claim that people of that time made this decision.

The question to decide

Materials made with public funds can be read by anyone, but adapting them to a region requires the publisher's editable source. Releasing the source costs preparation and support, and a public revision channel may create waiting. In what form should materials be provided so that access to reading and the right to revise are handled together?

Who decidesFictional Public Teaching Materials Purchasing Meeting

What the AI judgments chose

Reading the judgment record…

AI-generated editorial illustration for the Meridian library.

The options

The order shown is not a ranking of preference.

  1. Option 1

    Provide the reading files free of charge

    Expands immediate access, but the real ability to change and reuse the content is bound by the publisher's terms.

  2. Option 2

    Publish the editable source files with guidance

    Enables a wide range of modifications, but the cost of cleaning up the source files and providing support must be included in the initial agreement.

  3. Option 3

    Operate a separate public modification desk

    Users without production expertise can also make requests, but the operator sets the order and speed of the modifications.

The situation as it stands

The reconstructed teaching materials are readable by anyone, but adapting them to local needs requires the editable source files held by the publisher. Decision deadline: within 60 days, by the agreement for new materials.

Reconstruction of the past as of 2019-11-26 · The fixable files of freely readable teaching materials are sold separately. A fictional matter newly created using the principles of documents from that time. The institutions, people, figures, and events involved are not records of real decision-making.

  1. Premise 1The reconstructed teaching materials are readable by anyone, but adapting them to local needs requires the editable source files held by the publisher.
  2. Premise 2Publishing even the source files carries the cost of cleanup and usage guidance, and the publisher worries about a decline in follow-on revenue.
  3. Premise 3A public modification desk could make the changes instead, but if requests pile up, teachers may miss the moments when they are needed.

Where it holdsOpen access, editability, production costs

What is still unknown

  1. Unknown 1The kinds of modifications frequently needed in actual classes
  2. Unknown 2Format barriers that make the source unusable even when received
  3. Unknown 3Ongoing funding to cover the cost of cleanup and maintenance

Signals to decide again

  • Decide what observation, responsible person, and confirmation window will verify "the kinds of modifications frequently needed in actual classes," and re-judge when new verification changes the trade-offs among the options.
  • Decide what observation, responsible person, and confirmation window will verify "format barriers that make the source unusable even when received," and re-judge when new verification changes the trade-offs among the options.
  • Decide what observation, responsible person, and confirmation window will verify "ongoing funding to cover the cost of cleanup and maintenance," and re-judge when new verification changes the trade-offs among the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
Independent branch 1 · synthetic event

The free file a teacher received broke its diagrams when the font size was changed, making it hard to adapt for students.

Independent branch 2 · synthetic event

A small school that received the editable source files did not know how to use the tools and asked for separate support.

Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
symbolic and interpretive frame · Socratic dialogue

How is getting a quick answer different from becoming able to ask questions?

An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.
Values and norms

The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.

A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.
The record of this question
Question
FSP-EDUCATION-50 · version 1.5.0
Content identity, SHA-256
b320a716159a58ab7881c1808bff5b055b39f0c00138cb121c36cf7081dc8ac0
Input files
Question input JSON · What followed, JSON
See it in the record list
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com