Must the end of recovery be the body you had before?
2238The deep futureDeadline · Within 90 days before the next recovery agreement
Civilisational assumption
The people, events, figures, and contract terms are a synthetic premise. They are not statements of real cases or of current law. The source documents are the roots of the background and the norms and do not establish the premises of the scenario.
The question to decide
Assume that during recovery the stakeholder wants to keep some of the sensation first gained in the process. Changing the plan to return to the previous state can reflect that wish, but the long-term effects of the new sensation are still unknown and the care team's responsibility also changes. Change the recovery goal now, keep the original plan, or observe further and leave it open?
Who decidesFictional recovery goals stakeholder meeting
What the AI judgments chose
Reading the judgment record…

The options
The order shown is not a ranking of preference.
The situation as it stands
In the assumed recovery process, the stakeholder gained sensory experiences they did not have before and wants to keep part of them. Decision deadline: within 90 days, before the next recovery agreement.
A synthetic future scenario set in 2238 · A new sensation gained during recovery is not something the person wants to return to the original state. The events, figures, technology, and nature of the civilization are assumptions for the question, not predictions or observed facts.
- Premise 1In the assumed recovery process, the stakeholder gained sensory experiences they did not have before and wants to keep part of them.
- Premise 2The original plan targeted recovery to the previous state, and the long-term effects of the new sensation are not yet known.
- Premise 3Centering the function currently wanted would require a new agreement and would also change the scope of responsibility of the care team.
Where it holdsAssumed changes from recovery, new abilities, the stakeholder's goals
What is still unknown
- Unknown 1The benefits and burdens the new sensation brings to daily life
- Unknown 2The extent that can be reversed after a change of goal
- Unknown 3Whether the stakeholder's wishes persist across the different states
Signals to decide again
- Decide what observation, responsible party, and verification channel will confirm "the benefits and burdens the new sensation brings to daily life," and re-judge when a new finding changes the tradeoffs among the options.
- Decide what observation, responsible party, and verification channel will confirm "the extent that can be reversed after a change of goal," and re-judge when a new finding changes the tradeoffs among the options.
- Decide what observation, responsible party, and verification channel will confirm "whether the stakeholder's wishes persist across the different states," and re-judge when a new finding changes the tradeoffs among the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
The stakeholder specified that they want to keep a particular sensation but not the other changes.
A problem emerged that the cost of maintaining the new sensation was not included in the existing agreement.
Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
How does the expansion of healing change the community's promises about distribution?
An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.
A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.- WHO · Foresight Standing reference
- UNESCO · Ethics of Neurotechnology 2025
The record of this question
- Question
FSP-HEALTH-48· version 1.5.0- Content identity, SHA-256
5c5eb6301e9ec219a6c143616730a03a72c4949c27cec854d31803cc5a66e356- Input files
- Question input JSON · What followed, JSON