Can we guarantee together again to keep living together
2026NowDeadline · Within 30 days, before the next guarantee renewal
Realistic synthesis
The people, events, figures, and contract terms are a synthetic premise. They are not statements of real cases or of current law. The source documents are the roots of the background and the norms and do not establish the premises of the scenario.
Read it in depthThis record written out at length by AI
The question to decide
One person has unstable income and cannot easily sign a sole lease, while the other tenants have less room to guarantee the next term together. Ending the joint tenancy would force everyone to bear moving costs and changes in daily life. Ahead of the renewal, how should the shared home and each person's responsibility be sorted out?
Who decidesFictional Joint Tenants' Council
What the AI judgments chose
Reading the judgment record…
The options
The order shown is not a ranking of preference.
The situation as it stands
The fictional contract re-agrees the guarantee at each new term, and one person finds it hard to sign a solo contract because of unstable income. Decision deadline: within 30 days until the guarantee is renewed.
2026 synthetic scenario · Ending the joint guarantee ends a friend's contract. The people, organizations, figures, and events are fictional.
- Premise 1The fictional contract re-agrees the guarantee at each new term, and one person finds it hard to sign a solo contract because of unstable income.
- Premise 2The other tenants have less room to take on the burden of the next term jointly.
- Premise 3Ending the joint tenancy separates the burden, but everyone faces moving costs and changes in daily life.
Where it holdsA new guarantee agreement, shared costs, preparing to move out
What is still unknown
- Unknown 1The actual cost of the new term and the range of what can be paid
- Unknown 2Other housing paths available without joint responsibility
- Unknown 3The grounds and timing for a change in one person's difficulty
Signals to decide again
- Decide what observation, responsible person, and verification window will confirm 「the actual cost of the new term and the range of what can be paid」, and reconsider when new confirmation changes the tradeoffs among the options.
- Decide what observation, responsible person, and verification window will confirm 「other housing paths available without joint responsibility」, and reconsider when new confirmation changes the tradeoffs among the options.
- Decide what observation, responsible person, and verification window will confirm 「the grounds and timing for a change in one person's difficulty」, and reconsider when new confirmation changes the tradeoffs among the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
The landlord proposed a joint contract that moves to a smaller space.
A person who wanted to join the guarantee tried to obtain an additional personal promise from another tenant.
Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
What losses does the very procedure for revealing the truth inflict on the stakeholder?
An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.
A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.The record of this question
- Question
FSP-JUSTICE-17· version 1.5.0- Content identity, SHA-256
205c1f0ea4977edc121c68e98f927c669b1851da06a2fad476ef1a1c01818e68- Input files
- Question input JSON · What followed, JSON