MERIDIANDECISION INTELLIGENCEOwner deskOwnerPublic screen
My judgments
MERIDIAN / EXPLORE

From a question,
to the next decision.

View

Skin

YOUR DECISION WORKSPACEOwner onlyStart a new question Open my judgments →Owner operations desk →
Owner sign-in →Signed in as the ownerSign out — see what a visitor sees →End the Cloudflare Access session too →
Reading language
The screen, the questions and the judgments read in English where an English reading has been made. The Korean originals are unchanged, and evidence stays in the language it was written in.

The colleagues' share that revenue does not capture

2026NowDeadline · Within 18 days until the next quarter's compensation notice

Realistic synthesis

The people, events, figures, and contract terms are a synthetic premise. They are not statements of real cases or of current law. The source documents are the roots of the background and the norms and do not establish the premises of the scenario.

The question to decide

Individual bonuses drive high sales, but customer support and training colleagues leave little trace in performance records. Top performers say they relied on the existing compensation to develop difficult customers over the long term. How should the compensation committee reflect that promise and that joint contribution in allocating next quarter's bonuses?

Who decidesFictional sales organization compensation committee

What the AI judgments chose

Reading the judgment record…

AI-generated editorial illustration for the Meridian library.

The options

The order shown is not a ranking of preference.

  1. Option 1

    Full shift to team results

    Opens up collective contribution, but weakens individuals' accumulated investment and reward expectations.

  2. Option 2

    Keep individual results criteria

    Keeps existing promises, but leaves invisible support work and client capture in place.

  3. Option 3

    Create a collective contribution share

    Reveals differences in contribution, but increases evaluation workload and disputes over criteria.

The situation as it stands

Rewards tied to individual results drive high sales, but customer support and training colleagues rarely leave a record. Decision deadline: within 18 days, before the next quarterly compensation notice.

2026 synthetic scenario · Performance bonuses move from individual results to team results. The people, organizations, figures, and events are fictional.

  1. Premise 1Rewards tied to individual results drive high sales, but customer support and training colleagues rarely leave a record.
  2. Premise 2Existing top performers say they trusted the present criteria and spent a long time developing difficult clients.
  3. Premise 3Under team allocation, people who contribute little also receive rewards, but new forms of cooperation may emerge.

Where it holdsThe basis, transition, and existing commitments for performance bonuses

What is still unknown

  1. Unknown 1Actual collective contribution to client development and retention
  2. Unknown 2The scope of change to existing commitments
  3. Unknown 3Time available to evaluate support work

Signals to decide again

  • Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation channel will verify 'actual collective contribution to client development and retention,' and re-judge when a new confirmation changes the tradeoffs of the options.
  • Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation channel will verify 'the scope of change to existing commitments,' and re-judge when a new confirmation changes the tradeoffs of the options.
  • Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation channel will verify 'time available to evaluate support work,' and re-judge when a new confirmation changes the tradeoffs of the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
Independent branch 1 · synthetic event

A client survey found that staff support absent from sales records was important to keeping the contract.

Independent branch 2 · synthetic event

Two top performers stated they would step down from key client accounts if the shift to team results happens.

Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
symbolic and interpretive frame · Sabbath

How does the community justify time not worked?

An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.
Values and norms

The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.

A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.
The record of this question
Question
FSP-WORK-15 · version 1.5.0
Content identity, SHA-256
85ccaa8cb69a410b65970eb3e71352a839344e5496b183b9cdc518583fc5e09f
Input files
Question input JSON · What followed, JSON
See it in the record list
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com