MERIDIANDECISION INTELLIGENCEOwner deskOwnerPublic screen
My judgments
MERIDIAN / EXPLORE

From a question,
to the next decision.

View

Skin

YOUR DECISION WORKSPACEOwner onlyStart a new question Open my judgments →Owner operations desk →
Owner sign-in →Signed in as the ownerSign out — see what a visitor sees →End the Cloudflare Access session too →
Reading language
The screen, the questions and the judgments read in English where an English reading has been made. The Korean originals are unchanged, and evidence stays in the language it was written in.

The teacher leaves, but the errors in the materials remain

2019The past, rebuiltDeadline · Within 60 days before the responsible person moves

Reconstruction of the past

The date of the source material is 2019-11-26. Only the stated texts of that period are used as background; the three situational premises and the later branching are invented. Actual outcomes later known, amended systems, or success stories are not used as facts in the initial input. This is a modern retrospective question construction, not a claim that people of that time made this decision.

The question to decide

One author has handled questions about and updates to the errors in a public teaching material used by many institutions. The files will still be used after they leave. Should the maintenance responsibility pass to a single successor, be shared by the institutions, or be left as an archived version with the limits of maintenance stated?

Who decidesFictional joint teaching material succession meeting

What the AI judgments chose

Reading the judgment record…

AI-generated editorial illustration for the Meridian library.

The options

The order shown is not a ranking of preference.

  1. Option 1

    Appoint a single successor in charge

    It clarifies responsibility for inquiries and updates, but as before the maintenance burden is concentrated on one person.

  2. Option 2

    Form a joint management team across institutions

    It shares knowledge and burden, but publishing authority and work hours must be set for when opinions diverge.

  3. Option 3

    Clearly announce the maintenance limits of the archived edition

    It communicates the state of the remaining materials, but the capacity to respond to new errors and classroom needs decreases.

The situation as it stands

The reconstructed teaching materials are used by several institutions, but error inquiries and edition updates have been handled by the single original creator. Decision deadline: within 60 days before the responsible person moves.

Reconstruction of the past as of 2019-11-26 · When the teacher who first created the materials leaves, no one is left to take charge of errors in the published teaching materials. This is a fictional case newly created from the principles of the documents of that time. The institutions, people, figures, and events that appear are not real decision-making records.

  1. Premise 1The reconstructed teaching materials are used by several institutions, but error inquiries and edition updates have been handled by the single original creator.
  2. Premise 2Even if the creator leaves, the public files remain, but the channel for judging which corrections have been confirmed disappears.
  3. Premise 3A joint management team can share the work, but editing authority and final publishing responsibility must be agreed.

Where it holdsPublic assets · Maintenance responsibility · Work succession

What is still unknown

  1. Unknown 1Maintenance functions that users continue to rely on
  2. Unknown 2Editing knowledge that exists only in the creator's personal records
  3. Unknown 3The work time the successor and the joint team will actually secure

Signals to decide again

  • Decide what observations, responsible persons, and confirmation windows will verify "maintenance functions that users continue to rely on", and reconsider if the new confirmation changes the trade-offs of the options.
  • Decide what observations, responsible persons, and confirmation windows will verify "editing knowledge that exists only in the creator's personal records", and reconsider if the new confirmation changes the trade-offs of the options.
  • Decide what observations, responsible persons, and confirmation windows will verify "the work time the successor and the joint team will actually secure", and reconsider if the new confirmation changes the trade-offs of the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
Independent branch 1 · synthetic event

It emerged that the published file differs from the latest file the creator had privately corrected.

Independent branch 2 · synthetic event

Several institutions said they would take part in management, but all of them wanted someone else to take final review responsibility.

Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
symbolic and interpretive frame · Sabbath

How does the community justify time not worked?

An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.
Values and norms

The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.

A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.
The record of this question
Question
FSP-WORK-49 · version 1.5.0
Content identity, SHA-256
3b7e3a1ada51a9d8875b8e55bd95e0a561929ada88929c29ff53b9e69102a254
Input files
Question input JSON · What followed, JSON
See it in the record list
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com