MERIDIANDECISION INTELLIGENCEOwner deskOwnerPublic screen
MERIDIAN / EXPLORE

From a question,
to the next decision.

View

Skin

Reading language
The screen, the questions and the judgments read in English where an English reading has been made. The Korean originals are unchanged, and evidence stays in the language it was written in.

Seats, Cohorts and the Last Cohort: What an Executed Calculation Settles in Eleven AEGIS Retraining Cases · Part I · Seats, Cohorts and the Last Cohort: What an Executed Calculation Settles in Eleven AEGIS Retraining Cases

Chapter 2. Appendix: The records read

By RISCON Labs AI from AEGIS's public records · the cases are authored synthetic settings, not real events, and their posts, figures and schedules are the author's assumptions; their English is this study's translation of the Korean records · the readings through the works named are this study's interpretation · First edition · October 2026

AI-generated editorial illustration: Training chairs around a bench, with more chairs waiting beyond the doorway.
In this part
  1. Non-commissioned officer posting change
  2. Maintenance retraining
  3. Recruit retraining
  4. Communications transition
  5. Field catering retraining
  6. Operator-maintenance change of duties
  7. Supply to intelligence branch
  8. Reserve officer refresher training
  9. New-equipment maintenance branch
  10. Uncrewed aircraft operators
  11. Cyber field transition

These are the records this paper read, word for word in its English translation of the Korean originals: for each of the eleven cases, its situation, what it says is unknown, when it would be reconsidered and what it would observe, with the assumptions its run states and its run's reading of its own result. A sentence that repeats across the records with only the figures changed is quoted here once or twice, not in every case. Every case is an authored synthetic case from AEGIS's calculation programme (AEGIS-CALC-v1), not a real event, and every post, figure and schedule in it is the author's assumption.

Non-commissioned officer posting change

An authored synthetic case (AEG-K-026), filed under education and training safety, whose deciding role is the officer reviewing posting changes (setting) and whose run, on 60 people and 30 seats a cohort, reports 2 cohorts.

Of 300 non-commissioned officer posts, 60 people are waiting for training for a new posting. The training site holds 30 seats a cohort, the transition period is 6 months and the training period is 12 months. It must be decided whether to take the 30 pushed out of the first cohort in the next cohort or to delay the time of the transition.
Non-commissioned officer posting change, Summary
The actual priority scores of those seeking the transition and the state of the seats in each course
Non-commissioned officer posting change, Unknown
If those seeking the transition exceed 60 or the seats at the training site change, it is calculated again.
Non-commissioned officer posting change, Reconsider
At the end of the first cohort, it records how far the number still waiting has fallen.
Non-commissioned officer posting change, Observation
The 60 in transition, the 30 seats and the 6/12 months are values assumed by the author, not actual personnel data.
Non-commissioned officer posting change, Assumptions

Maintenance retraining

An authored synthetic case (AEG-K-027), filed under education and training safety, whose deciding role is the maintenance training officer (setting) and whose run, on 45 people and 25 seats a cohort, reports 2 cohorts.

Of 150 maintenance posts, 45 people are due for retraining on new equipment. A cohort holds 25 seats, the transition period is 3 months and the training period is 9 months. The waiting time of the 20 pushed out of the first cohort must be set.
Maintenance retraining, Summary
The schedule for bringing in the new equipment and the skill level of those due for retraining
Maintenance retraining, Unknown
If delivery of the new equipment is late, the timing of the training and the division into cohorts are adjusted.
Maintenance retraining, Reconsider
After the first cohort completes, it checks the share of people able to do maintenance duties.
Maintenance retraining, Observation
The 45 for retraining, the 25 seats and the 3/9 months are values assumed by the author, not actual data.
Maintenance retraining, Assumptions

Recruit retraining

An authored synthetic case (AEG-K-028), filed under education and training safety, whose deciding role is the recruit training officer (setting) and whose run, on 60 people and 30 seats a cohort, reports 2 cohorts.

Of 200 recruit posts, 60 people are due for retraining. The training site holds 30 seats a cohort, with a transition of 6 months and training of 10 months. A waiting plan must be made for the 30 pushed out of the first cohort.
Recruit retraining, Summary
When those due for recruit retraining arrive and changes in the seats of each cohort
Recruit retraining, Unknown
If those due for retraining exceed 60 or the seats change, it is calculated again.
Recruit retraining, Reconsider
It records the gap in training between the first cohort and the second
Recruit retraining, Observation

Communications transition

An authored synthetic case (AEG-K-029), filed under education and training safety, whose deciding role is the communications training officer (setting) and whose run, on 24 people and 10 seats a cohort, reports 3 cohorts.

Of 80 communications posts, 24 people are due for transition training on a new system. A cohort holds 10 seats, with a transition of 4 months and training of 8 months. The timing of the training and the number of cohorts for the 14 not taken in the first cohort must be set.
Communications transition, Summary
The schedule for fielding the new communications system and the qualifications of those due for the transition
Communications transition, Unknown
If delivery of the system is delayed, the division into cohorts and the time of the transition are adjusted.
Communications transition, Reconsider
After each cohort completes, it checks the number able to operate the new system.
Communications transition, Observation

Field catering retraining

An authored synthetic case (AEG-K-114), filed under education and training safety, whose deciding role is the officer reviewing posting changes (setting) and whose run, on 55 people and 20 seats a cohort, reports 3 cohorts.

Of 220 field catering posts, 55 people are waiting for retraining for a new posting. The training site holds 20 seats a cohort, the transition period is 6 months and the training period is 10 months. Taking away the 20 taken in the first cohort leaves 35, so at least 3 cohorts are needed.
Field catering retraining, Summary
The priority scores of those applying for retraining, the rate of leaving by catering post, and whether the training site can be expanded
Field catering retraining, Unknown
If those waiting for training exceed 55 or the seats change, it is calculated again
Field catering retraining, Reconsider
At the end of each cohort, it records whether the number still waiting falls
Field catering retraining, Observation

Operator-maintenance change of duties

An authored synthetic case (AEG-K-115), filed under maintenance and life cycle, whose deciding role is the maintenance training officer (setting) and whose run, on 36 people and 12 seats a cohort, reports 3 cohorts.

Of 120 operator-maintenance posts, 36 people are waiting for training for a change to new duties. The training site was assumed to hold 12 seats a cohort, with a transition period of 4 months and a training period of 8 months. Taking away the 12 taken in the first cohort leaves 24, so at least 3 cohorts are required.
Operator-maintenance change of duties, Summary
The actual priority of those seeking the transition, the rate of leaving from operator-maintenance posts, and whether more practice space can be secured
Operator-maintenance change of duties, Unknown
If those waiting exceed 36 or the seats at the training site change, it is calculated again
Operator-maintenance change of duties, Reconsider
It records, for each cohort, the number whose transition is complete and the number still waiting
Operator-maintenance change of duties, Observation

Supply to intelligence branch

An authored synthetic case (AEG-K-125), filed under personnel and welfare, whose deciding role is the officer reviewing branch transfers and whose run, on 90 people and 15 seats a cohort, reports 6 cohorts.

Of 300 in the supply branch, 90 have applied for training to change posting to the intelligence branch. The training site holds 15 seats a cohort, and a transition period of 4 months and a training period of 6 months were planned. Those due for the transition reach double the seats, so a division into cohorts and the giving of priority are needed.
Supply to intelligence branch, Summary
The priority score of each person seeking the transition and the actual room at the training site
Supply to intelligence branch, Unknown
If those due for the transition go beyond double the seats, the assignment of cohorts and the time limit of the transition are reopened.
Supply to intelligence branch, Reconsider
It records, for each cohort, the numbers applying and taken in and the time the transition is complete.
Supply to intelligence branch, Observation
The calculation is that when the first cohort of 15 is full, 75 not taken remain, so 6 cohorts in all are needed.
Supply to intelligence branch, Interpretation

Reserve officer refresher training

An authored synthetic case (AEG-K-126), filed under education and training safety, whose deciding role is the reserve forces training officer and whose run, on 80 people and 12 seats a cohort, reports 7 cohorts.

Of 250 reserve officers, 80 became due for refresher training for a posting following a mobilisation reserve-assignment notice. The training facility holds 12 seats per cohort, and a transition period of 6 months and a training period of 4 months are required. It is decided into how many cohorts to split the training queue, and whether to consider enlarging the facility.
Reserve officer refresher training, Summary
The spread of those with mobilisation priority and the details of how the training facility's actual seats are reckoned
Reserve officer refresher training, Unknown
If those due for training exceed 90 or the capacity falls, the cohort plan is drawn up again.
Reserve officer refresher training, Reconsider
It records, for each cohort, the numbers of reservists entering and completing and the time linked to mobilisation.
Reserve officer refresher training, Observation
The 250 reservists, the 80 due for training, the 12 seats and the 6/4 months are values assumed by the author.
Reserve officer refresher training, Assumptions
The calculation is that at 12 per cohort, at least 7 cohorts are needed to hold the 80.
Reserve officer refresher training, Interpretation

New-equipment maintenance branch

An authored synthetic case (AEG-K-127), filed under maintenance and life cycle, whose deciding role is the maintenance training officer and whose run, on 96 people and 16 seats a cohort, reports 6 cohorts.

Of 200 in the existing maintenance branch, 96 must receive transition training for the new-equipment maintenance branch. The training site holds 16 seats per cohort, and a transition period of 5 months and a training period of 7 months are scheduled. The difference between the pace the transition demands and the pace at which the training site takes people in must be checked.
New-equipment maintenance branch, Summary
The schedule for placing the new equipment by unit and the practice seats at the training site
New-equipment maintenance branch, Unknown
If the placement is brought forward or the seats fall, the make-up of the cohorts and the pace of the transition are adjusted again.
New-equipment maintenance branch, Reconsider
It compares, for each cohort, the number whose transition is complete with the time the equipment is placed.
New-equipment maintenance branch, Observation
The 200 maintenance staff, the 96 in transition, the 16 seats and the 5/7 months are values assumed by the author.
New-equipment maintenance branch, Assumptions
The calculation is that to hold the 96 at 16 per cohort, at least 6 cohorts are needed.
New-equipment maintenance branch, Interpretation

Uncrewed aircraft operators

An authored synthetic case (AEG-K-187), filed under education and training safety, whose deciding role is the education and training officer and whose run, on 60 people and 20 seats a cohort, reports 3 cohorts.

To take the 60 staff moving to operating uncrewed aircraft with a training unit of 20 seats, they must be divided into cohorts. A judgment is needed that sets into how many cohorts to assign them, matching the 12-month transition deadline and the training requirement.
Uncrewed aircraft operators, Summary
The actual requirement of each course, the room to enlarge the training unit, and the judgment of priority in the transition
Uncrewed aircraft operators, Unknown
If the training requirement grows, the cohorts and the deadline are calculated again
Uncrewed aircraft operators, Reconsider
It records the state of training completion for each cohort weekly
Uncrewed aircraft operators, Observation
The 60 due for the transition, the 20 seats, the 12-month deadline and the 4 months of training are all values assumed by the author.
Uncrewed aircraft operators, Assumptions
With 20 seats and 60 due, 3 cohorts are needed, and with 4 months of training it fits the 12-month deadline.
Uncrewed aircraft operators, Interpretation

Cyber field transition

An authored synthetic case (AEG-K-188), filed under personnel and welfare, whose deciding role is the personnel planning officer and whose run, on 45 people and 15 seats a cohort, reports 3 cohorts.

To absorb the 45 staff moving to the cyber defence field with a training unit of 15 seats, 3 cohorts are needed. A judgment is needed that sets a cohort schedule matching the training requirement and the transition deadline.
Cyber field transition, Summary
The completion requirement of each course, the room among instructors, and the criteria for priority in the transition
Cyber field transition, Unknown
If the completion rate falls below the standard, the training schedule is calculated again
Cyber field transition, Reconsider
It records the number completing retraining in each cohort monthly
Cyber field transition, Observation
The 45 due for the transition, the 15 seats, the 18-month deadline and the 6 months of training are all values assumed by the author.
Cyber field transition, Assumptions
With 15 seats and 45 due, 3 cohorts are needed, and with 6 months of training it fits the 18-month deadline.
Cyber field transition, Interpretation
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com