These are the records this paper read, word for word in its English translation of the Korean originals: for each of the twelve cases, the reason it gives for its link to another case, its deadline, the inputs it says are needed, and its condition for reconsidering. Every case is an authored synthetic training case from AEGIS, not a real event.
Stockpile against disconnection
An authored synthetic training case of the correction programme (AEG-RVE-003) that AEGIS files under logistics and supply chains; its owner is the fictional long-term supply preparedness committee, and its setting is fictional, not a real event.
No. 9: They share chunk 01 R5, the annual 4,200 hours of transport aircraft. The allocation of hours between stockpile and supply transport and emergency air transport is deliberated together. Only this stated shared resource is taken as the ground for the link; budget, time or staff jointly allocated with other retained items were not confirmed, so no further link is made.
Before approval of the supply system for the next 6 months and of the allocation of annual transport hours
The tolerated range of demand forecast error by item, and its denominator
Six months of stock-out, stock and disconnection test records for the 12 items
The cost of the 72 billion won including storage and disposal, and the allocation table for the 4,200 hours of transport
If, under the fixed definition of error, accuracy below 85% and stock-outs above 9% are confirmed together, the expanded share of forecasting is compared again with the stockpile option. An increase in the stockpile and a reallocation of transport hours are approved jointly, leaving the costs already spent in place.
Processing or recycling minerals
An authored synthetic training case of the correction programme (AEG-RVE-004) that AEGIS files under logistics and supply chains; its owner is the fictional strategic minerals supply policy committee, and its setting is fictional, not a real event.
No. 6: They share chunk 01 R3, the 140 billion won for allied joint production and cooperation. The conflict of allocation between investment in processing lines and industrial cooperation and training is checked. No. 10: They share chunk 01 R7, the budget for mineral stockpiling and procurement. Investment in the supply base and the cost of storage locations are compared within the same budget, but the amounts allocated are not set arbitrarily. Only this stated shared resource is taken as the ground for the link; budget, time or staff jointly allocated with other retained items were not confirmed, so no further link is made.
Before approval of the next investment stage of the joint processing lines and the mineral stockpile
For each mineral to be shifted, the specification-compliant volume, demand by date and the start date of recycled supply
The quantity of the stockpile actually drawable until supply begins, its quality, storage period and losses
Line completion and contract termination costs, and the allocation of the 140 billion won for joint cooperation and of the stockpile budget
A total recycling share above 25% at the 2-year check and a delay to the 3-year completion only open an item-by-item review and do not trigger a shift automatically. Only where, for each target, the compliant volume, the time needed, the usable stockpile until supply begins and the advantage in cost have been verified is the corresponding uncontracted share of the lines shifted to recycling and stockpiling. Unconfirmed items are not shifted, and the supply obligations and the responsibility for terminating contracts remain.
Exercises or cooperation talks
An authored synthetic training case of the correction programme (AEG-RVE-006) that AEGIS files under alliances and diplomacy; its owner is the fictional combined cooperation budget coordination board, and its setting is fictional, not a real event.
No. 4: They share chunk 01 R3, the 140 billion won for allied joint production and cooperation. The conflict of allocation between investment in processing lines and industrial cooperation and training is checked. Only this stated shared resource is taken as the ground for the link; budget, time or staff jointly allocated with other retained items were not confirmed, so no further link is made.
Before approval of the next combined exercise schedule and of the joint allocation of the industrial cooperation negotiating team
The course of negotiation of the 6 cooperation projects and the approval issues remaining
The proficiency gaps and staff requirements of the 5-, 6- and 8-exercise options
The available time of the 40 staff and the allocation table for the 140 billion won of joint cooperation
If a project concentrated on has no implementation schedule after more than 3 years, further input to that project is deliberated again. Projects that can be signed are not stopped wholesale along with it, and the time and joint budget needed to restore the exercises are approved together.
Emergency airlift or sea
An authored synthetic training case of the correction programme (AEG-RVE-009) that AEGIS files under logistics and supply chains; its owner is the fictional emergency materiel transport policy council, and its setting is fictional, not a real event.
No. 3: They share chunk 01 R5, the annual 4,200 hours of transport aircraft. The allocation of hours between stockpile and supply transport and emergency air transport is deliberated together. Only this stated shared resource is taken as the ground for the link; budget, time or staff jointly allocated with other retained items were not confirmed, so no further link is made.
Before the emergency transport policy for the next 6 months and the allocation of annual air hours
For each request, the approved delivery time, the date of use needed, the validity period and the conditions for an interruption of essential support
Expected and actual arrival dates, the causes of breaches, and the period substitutes can support
Transport costs under the same conditions, and the approval table for changes to the joint allocation of the 4,200 hours
If a breach of an individual delivery time or of the validity period at the time of use stems from classification or the choice of transport, the shift of that item to sea is stopped and the budget is deliberated again. An interruption of essential support or its risk is reviewed again at once, without waiting for 15 of 34 cases or for the 6-month tally. The council approves the allocation after confirming whether air actually closes the gap and what effect it has on the other claims on the 4,200 hours.
Where to hold the minerals stockpile
An authored synthetic training case of the correction programme (AEG-RVE-010) that AEGIS files under logistics and supply chains; its owner is the fictional critical minerals stockpile committee, and its setting is fictional, not a real event.
No. 4: They share chunk 01 R7, the budget for mineral stockpiling and procurement. Investment in the supply base and the cost of storage locations are compared within the same budget, but the amounts allocated are not set arbitrarily. Only this stated shared resource is taken as the ground for the link; budget, time or staff jointly allocated with other retained items were not confirmed, so no further link is made.
Before construction of domestic stockpile facilities begins or a lease abroad is signed
Days of endurance separated by the demand and stock of each of the 7 minerals
The plan of receipts and issues for each storage site and the results of availability tests
The right to take stock out abroad, the lease costs and the conditions of substitute supply for a 30-day interruption
If the ratio of days that can be handled in the acceptance test is below 70%, the share not yet started is held back and the costs of supplements and of leasing abroad are deliberated again. Dispersal is not concluded to have failed from the low occupancy of empty warehouses alone.
Carrier budget to uncrewed vessels
An authored synthetic training case of the correction programme (AEG-RVE-011) that AEGIS files under pacific and maritime strategy; its owner is the fictional maritime forces investment council, and its setting is fictional, not a real event.
No. 18: It is stated that they share chunk 02 R3, maritime operating time. The demands on time of new vessels and of supply support are reviewed together, but the total time is awaiting input. Only this stated shared resource is taken as the ground for the link; budget, time or staff jointly allocated with other retained items were not confirmed, so no further link is made.
Before the joint deliberation of the next carrier maintenance and uncrewed vessel acquisition budgets
The approved non-offensive roles and the conditions for assessing substitution
Records of availability and interruption on the basis of the same planned days
The total costs of acquisition, maintenance and training for the carrier and the uncrewed vessels
If availability above 85% and independent confirmation of the roles and support costs are met together, the maintenance option is deliberated again. Number of ships and presence are not taken to be substituted automatically, and the support responsibilities remaining after a reduction are assigned.
Industrial contributions in cost sharing
An authored synthetic training case of the correction programme (AEG-RVE-012) that AEGIS files under alliances and diplomacy; its owner is the fictional alliance burden-sharing committee, and its setting is fictional, not a real event.
No. 19: They share chunk 02 R4, the alliance negotiating channel and budget. The conflict of negotiating staff and schedules between the consultation on industrial contributions and the reform of information sharing is checked. Only this stated shared resource is taken as the ground for the link; budget, time or staff jointly allocated with other retained items were not confirmed, so no further link is made.
Before the assessment criteria of the next cost-sharing agreement and the allocation of negotiating staff
The eligible items of contribution and return, and a formula that excludes double counting
The verified amounts implemented in each year of agreement
The allocation of staff and budget between the 14 months of additional negotiation and the consultation on information sharing
If eligible industrial return is below 30% of the contributions recognised in the same year, the industrial weight and the conditions of implementation are renegotiated. The responsibility to pay existing support and the other party's responsibility for non-implementation are not mixed.
Sharing failure data
An authored synthetic training case of the correction programme (AEG-RVE-013) that AEGIS files under disclosure and accountability; its owner is the fictional equipment information policy committee, and its setting is fictional, not a real event.
No. 19: They share chunk 02 R7, the information-sharing system. The burden on systems and review staff of classifying operational data and of the allied sharing window is checked together. Only this stated shared resource is taken as the ground for the link; budget, time or staff jointly allocated with other retained items were not confirmed, so no further link is made.
Before approval of the budget for reorganising the data classification system
The total number of applications and the processing days by type
The release authority for each item of data and the records of misclassification
The comparison conditions of the reports of faster failure discovery
If the average in the first quarter exceeds 11 days, the committee examines the causes of delay and changes the way data approved in advance are handled. A grade of non-disclosure is not lowered on mere delay alone.
Local parts or return repair
An authored synthetic training case of the correction programme (AEG-RVE-016) that AEGIS files under maintenance and life cycle; its owner is the fictional parts support procurement council, and its setting is fictional, not a real event.
No. 20: They share chunk 02 R6, the budget for parts and consumables. Investment in local procurement and the preservation of the supply of consumables change the allocation of the same funds. Only this stated shared resource is taken as the ground for the link; budget, time or staff jointly allocated with other retained items were not confirmed, so no further link is made.
Before the contract for local procurement equipment and the approval of the items concerned
Whether a shift is permitted for each part, and the scope of responsibility for quality
Data on delivery periods including inspection and rework
Equipment costs and the costs of return shipment, stock and verification
If more than 6% and 21 days or more are confirmed together, the shift of further items is stopped and supply by return shipment is restored. Items not approved for safety are held back at once, separately.
More supply ships
An authored synthetic training case of the correction programme (AEG-RVE-018) that AEGIS files under pacific and maritime strategy; its owner is the fictional maritime support acquisition committee, and its setting is fictional, not a real event.
No. 11: It is stated that they share chunk 02 R3, maritime operating time. The demands on time of new vessels and of supply support are reviewed together, but the total time is awaiting input. Only this stated shared resource is taken as the ground for the link; budget, time or staff jointly allocated with other retained items were not confirmed, so no further link is made.
Before approval of the supply ship acquisition project and the port support budget
Records of support demands paired under the same conditions, their completion deadlines, and those not completed
Records in days on both sides from receipt of the request to completion of supply, with waiting time kept separately
The staff and life-cycle costs of supply ships and of the port
If next quarter the completion rate of the fixed demands is below 75%, or under the paired same conditions the average total time of the supply-ship method is as long or longer than that of the port method, uncontracted procurement is held back. The clock of comparison runs, on both sides, from receipt of the request to completion of supply. If data on total time or uncompleted cases are insufficient, no shortening is recognised and further material for approval is required. The committee keeps the termination costs of existing contracts and the responsibility for extending port support.
Allied sharing procedure before grades
An authored synthetic training case of the correction programme (AEG-RVE-019) that AEGIS files under alliances and diplomacy; its owner is the fictional information cooperation policy committee, and its setting is fictional, not a real event.
No. 12: They share chunk 02 R4, the alliance negotiating channel and budget. The conflict of negotiating staff and schedules between the consultation on industrial contributions and the reform of information sharing is checked. No. 13: They share chunk 02 R7, the information-sharing system. The burden on systems and review staff of classifying operational data and of the allied sharing window is checked together. Only this stated shared resource is taken as the ground for the link; budget, time or staff jointly allocated with other retained items were not confirmed, so no further link is made.
Before approval of the plan to reorganise allied information cooperation and of the allocation of staff
Records of the processing stages of the 58 cases by data group
The need for protection and the release authority by grade
The staff for reorganising the window and the 9-month schedule
If the 12-day target is missed, the causes of delay and the release authority are checked separately. If it is a bottleneck at the window, the procedure is fixed; if it is unnecessary restriction, the grading option is reopened within the lawful scope.
Cutting consumables
An authored synthetic training case of the correction programme (AEG-RVE-020) that AEGIS files under logistics and supply chains; its owner is the fictional consumables budget council, and its setting is fictional, not a real event.
No. 16: They share chunk 02 R6, the budget for parts and consumables. Investment in local procurement and the preservation of the supply of consumables change the allocation of the same funds. Only this stated shared resource is taken as the ground for the link; budget, time or staff jointly allocated with other retained items were not confirmed, so no further link is made.
Before approval of next quarter's consumables contracts and the 15% savings plan
The available equipment-days of the same equipment group before and after
Stock, shortages and causes of stoppage by item
The distribution by item of the 7.2 billion won saving, and the cost of restoring it
If a fall of more than 3 percentage points against the previous quarter and the contribution of shortages are confirmed, that cut is withdrawn. If other failures are the cause, an increase for consumables is not approved automatically.