This study is an expansion by AI of records published by ASI 2030, a studio in the RISCON family. Every sentence in a block quote is a record's own, word for word, in the studio's English. The rest is AI writing. Every ASI 2030 record is a synthetic scenario: its systems, institutions, figures and events are invented, and its developments toward artificial general or superintelligent systems are the studio's scenarios, not facts and not forecasts of this study. The auditor's opinions are the studio's own, dated and revisable. The readings through the works named are this study's interpretation.
The records were read on 2026-10-06. This book was written on 2026-10-07.
Bibliography
- Zachary C. Lipton, The Mythos of Model Interpretability (2018).
- Tim Miller, Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences (2019).
- Brent Mittelstadt, Chris Russell and Sandra Wachter, Explaining Explanations in AI (2019).
- Cynthia Rudin, Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead (2019).
- Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh and Carlos Guestrin, "Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier (2016).
- Andrew D. Selbst and Solon Barocas, The Intuitive Appeal of Explainable Machines (2018).
- Sandra Wachter, Brent Mittelstadt and Luciano Floridi, Why a Right to Explanation of Automated Decision-Making Does Not Exist in the General Data Protection Regulation (2017).
- Lilian Edwards and Michael Veale, Slave to the Algorithm? Why a 'right to an explanation' is probably not the remedy you are looking for (2017).
- Margot E. Kaminski, The Right to Explanation, Explained (2018).
- Reuben Binns, Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason (2017).