This appendix gives the sixteen inquiries the paper read, in the order of the case list, word for word in the English translation made once for this study from Dionyas's Korean. All sixteen are general review designs that name no artist, work, market or period, and none carries a judgment; Dionyas publishes them as editorial question designs and does not say who drafted them. Under the first record of each domain every field is given except the second need; the later records give their title and question, the rest being the lines of their domain. The second need, on the subject under review, the period, the terms of comparison and counter-examples, is the one line not quoted here.
Success hidden
Dionyas inquiry inquiry:criticism:01, a general review design whose leading domain is criticism and recognition, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=inquiry%3Acriticism%3A01.
The evaluation that remains once commercial success is hidden
Between reading a work without knowing its sales and rank and reading it knowing its results, where do the grounds of criticism change?
Criticism and recognition · a general review design. The artist, work, market and period it applies to are named when it is recorded.
The actual work, the published judging criteria, the original texts of criticism and opposing evaluations
Does not settle artistic superiority by the results of awards, or pretend to speak for an institution's position.
Question designed · awaiting inquiry
Awards and the public
Dionyas inquiry inquiry:criticism:02, a general review design whose leading domain is criticism and recognition, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=inquiry%3Acriticism%3A02; its scope, needs, boundary and state are those of its domain, word for word as given under Success hidden.
Why awards and the public's response part ways
When awards, reviews and fans respond differently to the same work, how do the standard of achievement each recognises and the actual experience of listening differ?
Finish and novelty
Dionyas inquiry inquiry:criticism:03, a general review design whose leading domain is criticism and recognition, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=inquiry%3Acriticism%3A03; its scope, needs, boundary and state are those of its domain, word for word as given under Success hidden.
The scope for reading a contribution to its time
When comparing the contribution of a work that carries out an existing genre's grammar with precision and that of a work that opens an unfamiliar expression, how are finish and novelty to be discussed separately?
Outside the categories
Dionyas inquiry inquiry:criticism:04, a general review design whose leading domain is criticism and recognition, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=inquiry%3Acriticism%3A04; its scope, needs, boundary and state are those of its domain, word for word as given under Success hidden.
A work outside the institutional categories
When an album that crosses several genres and languages does not fit the award categories well, what must be looked at so as not to confuse the difficulty of classifying it with the work's achievement?
Praise and censure
Dionyas inquiry inquiry:criticism:05, a general review design whose leading domain is criticism and recognition, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=inquiry%3Acriticism%3A05; its scope, needs, boundary and state are those of its domain, word for word as given under Success hidden.
Reading the critics' counter-examples together
Where strong praise and harsh criticism take the same passage as their ground, what difference in aesthetic standards, rather than in the perception of fact, divides the judgments?
Changed by time
Dionyas inquiry inquiry:criticism:06, a general review design whose leading domain is criticism and recognition, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=inquiry%3Acriticism%3A06; its scope, needs, boundary and state are those of its domain, word for word as given under Success hidden.
A work's place, changed by time
When an album whose response was weak at the time of its release is re-evaluated years later, what context of society, genre and audience has changed, rather than the work itself?
No institution's name
Dionyas inquiry inquiry:criticism:07, a general review design whose leading domain is criticism and recognition, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=inquiry%3Acriticism%3A07; its scope, needs, boundary and state are those of its domain, word for word as given under Success hidden.
Judging without an institution's name
To review a work's artistic merit without standing in for the position of a particular awarding institution, how are the published categories and criteria to be recorded apart from our own interpretation?
Criticism for the next work
Dionyas inquiry inquiry:criticism:08, a general review design whose leading domain is criticism and recognition, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=inquiry%3Acriticism%3A08; its scope, needs, boundary and state are those of its domain, word for word as given under Success hidden.
When criticism helps the next work
If, in a review, the concrete production choices that can be fixed are told apart from differences of taste, what is the feedback the artist will take and the disagreement to be left standing?
The face a broadcast chooses
Dionyas inquiry inquiry:media:01, a general review design whose leading domain is media and programming, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=inquiry%3Amedia%3A01.
The face of the artist that a broadcast chooses
When a programme stresses a particular character more than the music, what different effects can arise for new recognition and for long-term musical identity?
Media and programming · a general review design. The artist, work, market and period it applies to are named when it is recorded.
The programmes, the original articles, the editing, the timing of exposure and the reception in each region
Does not confuse a medium's editorial direction with the artist's own position.
Question designed · awaiting inquiry
An edited remark
Dionyas inquiry inquiry:media:02, a general review design whose leading domain is media and programming, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=inquiry%3Amedia%3A02; its scope, needs, boundary and state are those of its domain, word for word as given under The face a broadcast chooses.
The context of an edited remark
When only one sentence of a long interview spreads as an article or a short video, does the interpretation of the person change once the original question and the remarks before and after it are checked?
Exposure and listening
Dionyas inquiry inquiry:media:03, a general review design whose leading domain is media and programming, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=inquiry%3Amedia%3A03; its scope, needs, boundary and state are those of its domain, word for word as given under The face a broadcast chooses.
The time lag between broadcast exposure and listening
If, after an appearance on a music show or an entertainment show, searches and listening move on different days, which scene of the programme is linked to the next action?
The radio version
Dionyas inquiry inquiry:media:04, a general review design whose leading domain is media and programming, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=inquiry%3Amedia%3A04; its scope, needs, boundary and state are those of its domain, word for word as given under The face a broadcast chooses.
A song fit for radio and the centre of the album
When a version suited to radio programming changes the length and expression of the original song, how are wider access and the work's intention to be reviewed together?
Repeated news
Dionyas inquiry inquiry:media:05, a general review design whose leading domain is media and programming, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=inquiry%3Amedia%3A05; its scope, needs, boundary and state are those of its domain, word for word as given under The face a broadcast chooses.
Should repeated news be taken as independent evaluation?
Where several outlets have rewritten the same press release, how is the volume of coverage to be told apart from independent criticism and interest?
A newcomer's first medium
Dionyas inquiry inquiry:media:06, a general review design whose leading domain is media and programming, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=inquiry%3Amedia%3A06; its scope, needs, boundary and state are those of its domain, word for word as given under The face a broadcast chooses.
The first medium a newcomer needs
Between a short appearance on a major broadcast and a long interview on a small music channel, which conditions matter more in conveying the expression of a newcomer not yet known?
The representative abroad
Dionyas inquiry inquiry:media:07, a general review design whose leading domain is media and programming, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=inquiry%3Amedia%3A07; its scope, needs, boundary and state are those of its domain, word for word as given under The face a broadcast chooses.
A success story translated by foreign media
When local media introduce a particular artist as the representative of a country or a genre, what of the actual differences between works and of the industrial context is left out?
Silence and overexposure
Dionyas inquiry inquiry:media:08, a general review design whose leading domain is media and programming, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=inquiry%3Amedia%3A08; its scope, needs, boundary and state are those of its domain, word for word as given under The face a broadcast chooses.
Between silence and overexposure
Where back-to-back appearances raise recognition but cut the time to prepare the music, which exposure is to be kept and which reduced for the next activity?