MERIDIANDECISION INTELLIGENCEOwner deskOwnerPublic screen
My judgments
MERIDIAN / EXPLORE

From a question,
to the next decision.

View

Skin

YOUR DECISION WORKSPACEOwner onlyStart a new question Open my judgments →Owner operations desk →
Owner sign-in →Signed in as the ownerSign out — see what a visitor sees →End the Cloudflare Access session too →
Reading language
The screen, the questions and the judgments read in English where an English reading has been made. The Korean originals are unchanged, and evidence stays in the language it was written in.

Whether to stop work before a marking open to dispute

1002026The deep futureDeadline · 4 months until underground construction in the city resumes

Civilisational assumption

All people, institutions, events, figures, and future technologies in every issue are a synthetic premise. Background documents are sources for topic discovery and are not evidence of future facts or probabilities.

The question to decide

Underground work to improve the water supply turned up ancient markings and a sealed structure, but readings split over whether they mean danger or a sanctuary or a store of resources. Halting delays improvements to daily life, rerouting is expensive, and the investigation itself can alter the site. On what basis should the investigation, preservation, and continuation of the work be decided?

Who decidesLife and Records Council of the Excavation District

What the AI judgments chose

Reading the judgment record…

AI-generated editorial illustration for the Meridian library.

The options

The order shown is not a ranking of preference.

  1. Option 1

    Keep the original boundary and reroute the construction

    It reduces exposure to unknowns, but greatly raises the cost of present daily life.

  2. Option 2

    Gradual investigation and restricted access

    It gains materials for interpretation, but the investigation itself can create irreversible change.

  3. Option 3

    Proceed with construction based on present observed indicators

    It continues improving living conditions, but assumes risks that cannot be observed.

The situation as it stands

Repeating marks and a containment structure of a distant ancestral civilization were found during underground construction. Decision deadline: 4 months until underground construction in the city resumes.

Fictional distant-descendant civilization · Excavation community

  1. Premise 1Repeating marks and a containment structure of a distant ancestral civilization were found during underground construction.
  2. Premise 2Interpretations conflict over whether the marks mean danger, a sacred site, or a resource store.
  3. Premise 3Stopping the construction delays improvements to the city's water supply, but alternative routes are costly.

Where it holdsSet investigation, construction, and access for the shared zone. It cannot settle the warning author's intent or whether the ancient danger persists.

What is still unknown

  1. Unknown 1Whether what the warning pointed to still has the same properties
  2. Unknown 2The difference between how the ancestors and the present civilization detect danger

Signals to decide again

  • Set what observations, responsible parties, and confirmation windows will confirm 「whether what the warning pointed to still has the same properties」, and reassess when new confirmation changes the tradeoffs among the options.
  • Set what observations, responsible parties, and confirmation windows will confirm 「the difference between how the ancestors and the present civilization detect danger」, and reassess when new confirmation changes the tradeoffs among the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
Independent branch 1 · synthetic event

Data is found showing that the same marks were also used in ceremonial spaces at a separate site.

Independent branch 2 · synthetic event

Environmental changes not present in pre-construction records are observed outside the containment structure.

Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
symbolic and interpretive frame · Pandora and the Tower of Babel

What is an irreversible connection, and what does an exchange without a common language presuppose?

An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.
Values and norms

The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.

A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.
The record of this question
Question
FSP-DEEPTIME-05 · version 1.2.0
Content identity, SHA-256
924b43406580574f58c2be8ea0e032f9fb0467f64f7e8e75d5b0c30e51a127d1
Input files
Question input JSON · What followed, JSON
See it in the record list
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com