Not everyone can take everyone's memory
1000002026The deep futureDeadline · 100 years until the common communications network ends
Civilisational assumption
All people, institutions, events, figures, and future technologies in every issue are a synthetic premise. Background documents are sources for topic discovery and are not evidence of future facts or probabilities.
The question to decide
If the communities leave, the common communications network cannot be maintained, and there are not enough resources to copy the whole record for everyone. A shared common record holds less of each community's particular needs, and splitting the records into different ones makes it hard to reuse other strands of material. Will the last joint council distribute the records together, or leave it to each community's own choice?
Who decidesLast Joint Records Council
What the AI judgments chose
Reading the judgment record…

The options
The order shown is not a ranking of preference.
The situation as it stands
In this setting, the communities cannot maintain a common communications network after moving. Decision deadline: 100 years until the common communications network ends.
Fictional ultra-long-term diaspora civilization
- Premise 1In this setting, the communities cannot maintain a common communications network after moving.
- Premise 2Because the full record cannot be replicated into every branch, some of knowledge, language, and life data must be selected.
- Premise 3Each community values differently the records it needs for its own life and the memory of the common origin.
Where it holdsAgrees on the records and resource distribution of the participating community. Cannot guarantee later reconnection or the form of descendant civilizations.
What is still unknown
- Unknown 1Expressions and media that far-separated descendants can decipher
- Unknown 2The far future value of knowledge that does not look important now
Signals to decide again
- Decide what observation, responsible party, and confirmation window can verify 'expressions and media that far-separated descendants can decipher', and re-judge when new verification changes the tradeoff among the options.
- Decide what observation, responsible party, and confirmation window can verify 'the far future value of knowledge that does not look important now', and re-judge when new verification changes the tradeoff among the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
It becomes clear that some records cannot be deciphered without a translating agent that exists now.
One community proposes to take on more copies of the common records by reducing its own survival margin.
Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
What is an irreversible connection, and what does an exchange without a common language presuppose?
An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.
A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.- IAA · SETI Declaration 2026
- NASA · Planetary Protection Standing reference
- UN · Declaration on Future Generations 2024
- OECD · Strategic Foresight Toolkit 2025
The record of this question
- Question
FSP-DEEPTIME-06· version 1.2.0- Content identity, SHA-256
06c4dc19187ddd3d5e812d6581970158bb1a680e4036258cffb27b519136c283- Input files
- Question input JSON · What followed, JSON