MERIDIANDECISION INTELLIGENCEOwner deskOwnerPublic screen
My judgments
MERIDIAN / EXPLORE

From a question,
to the next decision.

View

Skin

YOUR DECISION WORKSPACEOwner onlyStart a new question Open my judgments →Owner operations desk →
Owner sign-in →Signed in as the ownerSign out — see what a visitor sees →End the Cloudflare Access session too →
Reading language
The screen, the questions and the judgments read in English where an English reading has been made. The Korean originals are unchanged, and evidence stays in the language it was written in.

Must you use an app to receive care?

2026NowDeadline · Within 40 days before the platform renewal

Realistic synthesis

The people, events, figures, and contract terms are a synthetic premise. They are not statements of real cases or of current law. The source documents are the roots of the background and the norms and do not establish the premises of the scenario.

The question to decide

A health app makes records and contact easy, but some participants find it hard to use or do not want their data collected. Setting up separate contact reduces support staff, and ending the contract means transferring the record and contact systems. On what conditions should app use be required for program participation?

Who decidesFictional chronic daily-living support program operations meeting

What the AI judgments chose

Reading the judgment record…

AI-generated editorial illustration for the Meridian library.

The options

The order shown is not a ranking of preference.

  1. Option 1

    Keep app use mandatory

    Keeps support consistent but restricts access and the choice to opt out for non-users.

  2. Option 2

    Optional use with separate contact

    Opens a participation route but takes on dual operation and a reduction in support staff.

  3. Option 3

    Terminate the platform contract

    Reduces dependence on data, but continuity of records and contact wavers during the transition.

The situation as it stands

The app makes records and contact easy, but some participants find devices hard to use or do not want data collected. Decision deadline: within 40 days, before the platform renewal.

2026 synthetic scenario · Stopping use of a shared health app also cuts off care connections. The people, organizations, figures, and events are fictional.

  1. Premise 1The app makes records and contact easy, but some participants find devices hard to use or do not want data collected.
  2. Premise 2Running separate contact channels reduces the number of participants that can be supported with the same staff.
  3. Premise 3Ending the contract generates the cost of arranging new record transfers and contact systems.

Where it holdsApp records, offline participation, and service contracts

What is still unknown

  1. Unknown 1Data items essential to support
  2. Unknown 2The extent to which records can be transferred by other means
  3. Unknown 3Actual staff time to support non-users

Signals to decide again

  • Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation channel will confirm 'data items essential to support,' and reconsider when a new confirmation changes the trade-offs of the options.
  • Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation channel will confirm 'the extent to which records can be transferred by other means,' and reconsider when a new confirmation changes the trade-offs of the options.
  • Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation channel will confirm 'actual staff time to support non-users,' and reconsider when a new confirmation changes the trade-offs of the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
Independent branch 1 · synthetic event

The vendor said it would offer a mode that reduces data collection but raise the service fee.

Independent branch 2 · synthetic event

A group was confirmed to participate better through separate contact than through the app.

Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
symbolic and interpretive frame · Asclepius

How does the expansion of healing change the community's promises about distribution?

An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.
Values and norms

The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.

A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.
The record of this question
Question
FSP-HEALTH-19 · version 1.5.0
Content identity, SHA-256
88dc11e4fdb78c0fb3d440781f2901e9ee656cc3d55fa9c9f6feee758892aa90
Input files
Question input JSON · What followed, JSON
See it in the record list
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com