MERIDIANDECISION INTELLIGENCEOwner deskOwnerPublic screen
My judgments
MERIDIAN / EXPLORE

From a question,
to the next decision.

View

Skin

YOUR DECISION WORKSPACEOwner onlyStart a new question Open my judgments →Owner operations desk →
Owner sign-in →Signed in as the ownerSign out — see what a visitor sees →End the Cloudflare Access session too →
Reading language
The screen, the questions and the judgments read in English where an English reading has been made. The Korean originals are unchanged, and evidence stays in the language it was written in.

Do patients who never asked also get an explanation of the algorithm?

2026NowDeadline · Within 21 days before the pilot launch

Realistic synthesis

The people, events, figures, and contract terms are a synthetic premise. They are not statements of real cases or of current law. The source documents are the roots of the background and the norms and do not establish the premises of the scenario.

The question to decide

The algorithm does not make final decisions but shapes how records are organized and the order of review. If the explanation is long, the key point is buried, and if only the requester is told, people are left not knowing what to ask. How much should the hospital explain the tool's involvement, and to whom?

Who decidesFictional hospital tool review committee

What the AI judgments chose

Reading the judgment record…

AI-generated editorial illustration for the Meridian library.

The options

The order shown is not a ranking of preference.

  1. Option 1

    Standard explanation for all users

    Provides equal right to know, but creates the burden of long explanations and formal consent.

  2. Option 2

    Detailed explanation on request

    Provides the information people want, but leaves gaps for those who do not know what to ask.

  3. Option 3

    Vary explanations by impact

    Focuses on the important parts, but takes on omissions in impact classification and discretion.

The situation as it stands

The tool does not make final decisions; it is involved in organizing records and prioritizing review. Decision deadline: within 21 days, before the pilot rollout.

2026 synthetic scenario · Publishing the user guide for a clinical support algorithm. The people, organizations, figures, and events are fictional.

  1. Premise 1The tool does not make final decisions; it is involved in organizing records and prioritizing review.
  2. Premise 2Explaining every technical detail may obscure the key questions, but notifying only those who ask creates an information gap.
  3. Premise 3The criteria for classifying individual impacts have not yet been agreed within the hospital.

Where it holdsExplaining, reviewing, and notifying users about the support tool

What is still unknown

  1. Unknown 1Key information that would change a user's choice
  2. Unknown 2The procedure for challenging tool errors
  3. Unknown 3Staff capacity to explain the actual scope of impact

Signals to decide again

  • Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation channel will confirm 'key information that would change a user's choice,' and reconsider when a new confirmation changes the trade-offs of the options.
  • Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation channel will confirm 'the procedure for challenging tool errors,' and reconsider when a new confirmation changes the trade-offs of the options.
  • Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation channel will confirm 'staff capacity to explain the actual scope of impact,' and reconsider when a new confirmation changes the trade-offs of the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
Independent branch 1 · synthetic event

A user survey found that whether data moves outside the organization was a more important concern than tool performance.

Independent branch 2 · synthetic event

Pilot cases confirmed that the tool's impact extends beyond record organization.

Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
symbolic and interpretive frame · Asclepius

How does the expansion of healing change the community's promises about distribution?

An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.
Values and norms

The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.

A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.
The record of this question
Question
FSP-HEALTH-23 · version 1.5.0
Content identity, SHA-256
5548969f4efc33f576afdf241b9a8bde104cc72165a2ad066c88bd2eaee031fc
Input files
Question input JSON · What followed, JSON
See it in the record list
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com