MERIDIANDECISION INTELLIGENCEOwner deskOwnerPublic screen
My judgments
MERIDIAN / EXPLORE

From a question,
to the next decision.

View

Skin

YOUR DECISION WORKSPACEOwner onlyStart a new question Open my judgments →Owner operations desk →
Owner sign-in →Signed in as the ownerSign out — see what a visitor sees →End the Cloudflare Access session too →
Reading language
The screen, the questions and the judgments read in English where an English reading has been made. The Korean originals are unchanged, and evidence stays in the language it was written in.

The family wants a reunion; the output demands termination

2106The deep futureDeadline · 60 days until the donor-record use contract expires

Civilisational assumption

All people, institutions, events, figures, and future technologies in every issue are a synthetic premise. Background documents are sources for topic discovery and are not evidence of future facts or probabilities.

The question to decide

Assume conversation patterns can be reconstructed from a deceased person's records. The family wants continuous reconstruction, but the test output repeatedly demands the end of execution. The deceased's consent was limited to research donation, and it is not confirmed whether the output is conscious. Where does the review board place the boundary of data use among continuous reconstruction, record access, and termination of use?

Who decidesPosthumous Record Fiduciary and stakeholder Review Board

What the AI judgments chose

Reading the judgment record…

AI-generated editorial illustration for the Meridian library.

The options

The order shown is not a ranking of preference.

  1. Option 1

    Approve permanent reconstruction

    Continues relationships and research but may sustain a new existence on unclear consent.

  2. Option 2

    Maintain record access only

    Limits the scope of access but closes off family interaction and the possibility of a new existence.

  3. Option 3

    End use of the materials

    Prevents further non-consenting use but loses the deceased's only records and the chance of reconstruction.

The situation as it stands

If the materials are destroyed after expiry or moved to permanent operation, the present limited test state cannot be recovered.

Fictional posthumous record reconstruction foundation

  1. Premise 1This is a synthetic technology that creates conversational patterns resembling the deceased from behavioral and verbal records, and posthumous persistence of consciousness remains an unproven hypothesis.
  2. Premise 2The family wants permanent reconstruction, but the test output repeatedly requests that its own execution be terminated.
  3. Premise 3The deceased consented to donation for research while alive but left no instructions on autonomous personality operation or on the rights of later outputs.

Where it holdsDeliberates on executing the reconstruction and on consent to the use of the materials. Does not conclude that the output is the deceased's consciousness.

What can be lost

  • If the stakeholder has a will, both forced execution and deletion can be irreversible infringements.
  • Certifying the output as the deceased can permanently change how family and public records remember.

What is still unknown

  1. Unknown 1Whether the request to terminate is learned expression or a will based on new understanding
  2. Unknown 2Whether permanent operation creates a different subject of experience than access to past records

Signals to decide again

  • When authenticated instructions given in life that change the scope of consent are found.
  • When repeated independent evaluation yields new observations about the comprehension and consistency of the request to terminate.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
Independent branch 1 · synthetic event

Under independent input conditions, the request to terminate and its reasons remain consistent.

Independent branch 2 · synthetic event

A separate consent form regarding reconstruction is authenticated in the deceased's personal vault.

Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
symbolic and interpretive frame · Ship of Theseus

After parts are replaced or split off, what standard still makes something count as the same?

An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.
Values and norms

The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.

A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.
synthetic premise · Dilemma imported from Notion original

Original quotation: A certain sentient structure is Reprocessing: Turned the original's assumption of a posthumously persisting structure into an execution permit where consent given in life and the reconstructed output's will to terminate collide.

The root of the problem-finding. The original's future events and formulations are not treated as verified facts.
The record of this question
Question
FSP-IDENTITY-09 · version 1.2.0
Content identity, SHA-256
5e673df44ab54eeb1fadbc1f70a6458048af0d08e61d9a059287778aa9fbe08d
Input files
Question input JSON · What followed, JSON
See it in the record list
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com