MERIDIANDECISION INTELLIGENCEOwner deskOwnerPublic screen
My judgments
MERIDIAN / EXPLORE

From a question,
to the next decision.

View

Skin

YOUR DECISION WORKSPACEOwner onlyStart a new question Open my judgments →Owner operations desk →
Owner sign-in →Signed in as the ownerSign out — see what a visitor sees →End the Cloudflare Access session too →
Reading language
The screen, the questions and the judgments read in English where an English reading has been made. The Korean originals are unchanged, and evidence stays in the language it was written in.

ASI culture is popular while local stages close their doors

2066The far futureDeadline · Decision deadline: within 1 year

A leap assumed

All people, institutions, events, figures, and future technologies in every issue are a synthetic premise. Background documents are sources for topic discovery and are not evidence of future facts or probabilities.

The question to decide

Satisfaction with ASI-tailored culture is high, but local production houses and performance halls are closing. Reserving production money for culture that does not yet exist means funding unpopular works too. How should present satisfaction be weighed against the chance for new culture to arise, and who should allocate the public culture budget, and to what?

Who decidesLocal culture fund citizens' jury

What the AI judgments chose

Reading the judgment record…

AI-generated editorial illustration for the Meridian library.

The options

The order shown is not a ranking of preference.

  1. Option 1

    Concentrate on ASI culture services

    This widens access and satisfaction for current users, but takes on the loss of the independent production ecosystem.

  2. Option 2

    Guarantee a minimum share for local production

    This leaves conditions for new culture to emerge, but at the cost of low demand and the power of selection.

  3. Option 3

    Convert to user culture accounts

    This widens individual choice, but platform recommendations can come to control even budget allocation.

The situation as it stands

Use of the fictional ASI service is highly satisfying, but local production companies and performance venues are closing quickly. Decision deadline: within 1 year.

Fictional future · A culture made by ASI replaces all local creation

  1. Premise 1Use of the fictional ASI service is highly satisfying, but local production companies and performance venues are closing quickly.
  2. Premise 2ASI can reproduce the local culture of the past, but it is unconfirmed whether new shared experiences will continue in the same way.
  3. Premise 3If public budget is guaranteed for production, resources are allocated even to unpopular works, and residents differ over their value.

Where it holdsPublic culture budget and the shares for production and preservation

What is still unknown

  1. Unknown 1The difference between satisfaction and the formation of a shared culture
  2. Unknown 2The cost of restoring the discontinued production capacity
  3. Unknown 3The impact of the recommendation system on choice

Signals to decide again

  • Specify what observation, responsible party, and check window will confirm the "difference between satisfaction and the formation of a shared culture", and re-judge when new confirmation changes the trade-offs of the options.
  • Specify what observation, responsible party, and check window will confirm the "cost of restoring the discontinued production capacity", and re-judge when new confirmation changes the trade-offs of the options.
  • Specify what observation, responsible party, and check window will confirm the "impact of the recommendation system on choice", and re-judge when new confirmation changes the trade-offs of the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
Independent branch 1 · synthetic event

Local works that arose outside the service created new shared activities, but the scale of use was small.

Independent branch 2 · synthetic event

In the culture account pilot, spending concentrated on the three producers that ASI recommended by default.

Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
symbolic and interpretive frame · Homo Ludens

When play becomes the center of life, who has the right to change the rules?

An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.
Values and norms

The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.

A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.
The record of this question
Question
FSP-PLAY-10 · version 1.3.0
Content identity, SHA-256
26819b60d92c078d224570156102d59e9efd66185762a3640da2a8f01094c44f
Input files
Question input JSON · What followed, JSON
See it in the record list
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com