MERIDIANDECISION INTELLIGENCEOwner deskOwnerPublic screen
My judgments
MERIDIAN / EXPLORE

From a question,
to the next decision.

View

Skin

YOUR DECISION WORKSPACEOwner onlyStart a new question Open my judgments →Owner operations desk →
Owner sign-in →Signed in as the ownerSign out — see what a visitor sees →End the Cloudflare Access session too →
Reading language
The screen, the questions and the judgments read in English where an English reading has been made. The Korean originals are unchanged, and evidence stays in the language it was written in.

Family far away, a child who does not want to be recorded

2026NowDeadline · Within 21 days, before the viewing guidance

Realistic synthesis

The people, events, figures, and contract terms are a synthetic premise. They are not statements of real cases or of current law. The source documents are the roots of the background and the norms and do not establish the premises of the scenario.

Read it in depthThis record written out at length by AI

The question to decide

Some family members cannot attend the performance, but some children say they do not want video left behind. A guardian's consent can differ from the child's wishes, and video sent only to invitees is hard to control once copied. Considering both the distant family's chance to watch and the child's wishes, how and to whom should the performance be shown?

Who decidesFictional children's performance preparation meeting

What the AI judgments chose

Reading the judgment record…

AI-generated editorial illustration: A child holds a lens cap beside a rehearsal camera while a guardian listens.

The options

The order shown is not a ranking of preference.

  1. Option 1

    Livestream the performance publicly

    Widens remote viewing, but the children's appearance and remarks may be kept in unexpected contexts.

  2. Option 2

    Provide video only to invited people

    Opens family access while narrowing the scope, but the burden of copying and redistribution remains.

  3. Option 3

    On-site viewing only

    Reduces long-term exposure of the video, but loses the sharing opportunity for family who could not attend and for the children.

The situation as it stands

The fictional performance has family members who cannot attend because they live far away, and some children say they do not want the video kept. Decision deadline: within 21 days, by the visitor notice.

2026 synthetic scenario · Broadcasting a children's performance shows it to family and strangers alike. The people, organizations, figures, and events are synthetic.

  1. Premise 1The fictional performance has family members who cannot attend because they live far away, and some children say they do not want the video kept.
  2. Premise 2There are cases where a guardian's consent and the child's wish differ.
  3. Premise 3Even a restricted video is hard to control again in scope once a recipient copies it.

Where it holdsPerformance video, the children's wishes, family access

What is still unknown

  1. Unknown 1The filming and disclosure scope each child wants
  2. Unknown 2Ways to connect distant family without video
  3. Unknown 3The actual scope that can be deleted when wishes change

Signals to decide again

  • Define what observation, responsible person, and confirmation channel can verify 'the filming and disclosure scope each child wants,' and re-judge when a new confirmation changes the tradeoffs of the options.
  • Define what observation, responsible person, and confirmation channel can verify 'ways to connect distant family without video,' and re-judge when a new confirmation changes the tradeoffs of the options.
  • Define what observation, responsible person, and confirmation channel can verify 'the actual scope that can be deleted when wishes change,' and re-judge when a new confirmation changes the tradeoffs of the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
Independent branch 1 · synthetic event

One child refused filming on the day, contrary to the guardian's consent.

Independent branch 2 · synthetic event

Part of the invited video was re-uploaded to a public account.

Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
symbolic and interpretive frame · Homo Ludens

When play becomes the center of life, who has the right to change the rules?

An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.
Values and norms

The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.

A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.
The record of this question
Question
FSP-PLAY-14 · version 1.5.0
Content identity, SHA-256
b7f5d669b2cd618d800086148f2624e6c98bfb4414fda14053bf21eeaaa7545f
Input files
Question input JSON · What followed, JSON
See it in the record list
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com