MERIDIANDECISION INTELLIGENCEOwner deskOwnerPublic screen
My judgments
MERIDIAN / EXPLORE

From a question,
to the next decision.

View

Skin

YOUR DECISION WORKSPACEOwner onlyStart a new question Open my judgments →Owner operations desk →
Owner sign-in →Signed in as the ownerSign out — see what a visitor sees →End the Cloudflare Access session too →
Reading language
The screen, the questions and the judgments read in English where an English reading has been made. The Korean originals are unchanged, and evidence stays in the language it was written in.

Must everyone in the same event use the same device

2026NowDeadline · Within 30 days, before registration closes

Realistic synthesis

The people, events, figures, and contract terms are a synthetic premise. They are not statements of real cases or of current law. The source documents are the roots of the background and the norms and do not establish the premises of the scenario.

The question to decide

Some players use different input devices because of physical conditions, but performance differences among devices have not yet been verified. Unifying devices could make participation hard; dividing into separate divisions could leave too few players for a contest to hold. Balancing the chance to compete together against fairness in comparing records, how should the entry divisions and device rules be set?

Who decidesFictional amateur game tournament rules meeting

What the AI judgments chose

Reading the judgment record…

AI-generated editorial illustration for the Meridian library.

The options

The order shown is not a ranking of preference.

  1. Option 1

    Compete together in the same category

    Opens access to shared competition, but includes unverified device differences in the record comparison.

  2. Option 2

    Create separate categories by device

    Separates the comparison conditions, but takes on the loss of fewer participants and of separated recognition.

  3. Option 3

    Standardize the competition device specification

    Matches device conditions, but loses access for athletes who cannot participate with a common device.

The situation as it stands

The fictional athlete uses a different input device because of physical conditions, and each device has different comfortable and difficult movements. Decision deadline: within 30 days, by the entry registration.

2026 synthetic scenario · Athletes who entered with assistive input devices are compared on their records together. The people, organizations, figures, and events are synthetic.

  1. Premise 1The fictional athlete uses a different input device because of physical conditions, and each device has different comfortable and difficult movements.
  2. Premise 2The exact performance difference has not been verified, and even with the same device, individual skill differs.
  3. Premise 3A separate category can split the comparison, but with few participants it does not hold as a real match.

Where it holdsInput devices, entry categories, comparing records

What is still unknown

  1. Unknown 1The device's actual function that affects the result
  2. Unknown 2The number of participants needed for a separate category to hold as a match
  3. Unknown 3The limits that standardization places on individual movements

Signals to decide again

  • Define what observation, responsible person, and confirmation channel can verify 'the device's actual function that affects the result,' and re-judge when a new confirmation changes the tradeoffs of the options.
  • Define what observation, responsible person, and confirmation channel can verify 'the number of participants needed for a separate category to hold as a match,' and re-judge when a new confirmation changes the tradeoffs of the options.
  • Define what observation, responsible person, and confirmation channel can verify 'the limits that standardization places on individual movements,' and re-judge when a new confirmation changes the tradeoffs of the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
Independent branch 1 · synthetic event

Device comparisons showed an advantage on certain tasks but a major disadvantage on others.

Independent branch 2 · synthetic event

Registration closed with only one applicant for the separate category.

Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
symbolic and interpretive frame · Homo Ludens

When play becomes the center of life, who has the right to change the rules?

An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.
Values and norms

The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.

A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.
The record of this question
Question
FSP-PLAY-16 · version 1.5.0
Content identity, SHA-256
f78b1fce9d3196aab920867cd7e252997dad4cebbcfff9d05dbb09d023f15550
Input files
Question input JSON · What followed, JSON
See it in the record list
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com