The probation ends, but was the training enough?
2026NowDeadline · Within 8 days until the probation ends
Realistic synthesis
The people, events, figures, and contract terms are a synthetic premise. They are not statements of real cases or of current law. The source documents are the roots of the background and the norms and do not establish the premises of the scenario.
The question to decide
The probationary member fell short of the targets, but the trainer was also absent for half the probation period. More training delays other projects, and it is still unknown whether a permanent place can be made in another role where the member showed strength. Should the team end the contract with this member, extend the evaluation, or change the role?
Who decidesFictional small tech team hiring meeting
What the AI judgments chose
Reading the judgment record…

The options
The order shown is not a ranking of preference.
The situation as it stands
The member fell short of the required deliverables, but the assigned trainer was absent for half the period. Decision deadline: within 8 days, before probation ends.
2026 synthetic scenario · Separating whether a probation evaluation failure is a failure of training. The people, organizations, figures, and events are fictional.
- Premise 1The member fell short of the required deliverables, but the assigned trainer was absent for half the period.
- Premise 2The team is short-staffed and urgently needs people, and taking on extended training would delay other projects.
- Premise 3The member showed strengths in another role, but whether that role can be made into a regular position is unconfirmed.
Where it holdsConversion to regular employment, training, and contract termination for one probationary member
What is still unknown
- Unknown 1The core abilities that can be verified after sufficient training
- Unknown 2The training time the team can bear
- Unknown 3Work that persists in the alternative role
Signals to decide again
- Define what observations, owners, and confirmation windows will verify “the core abilities that can be verified after sufficient training,” and re-judge if a new confirmation changes the tradeoffs among the options.
- Define what observations, owners, and confirmation windows will verify “the training time the team can bear,” and re-judge if a new confirmation changes the tradeoffs among the options.
- Define what observations, owners, and confirmation windows will verify “work that persists in the alternative role,” and re-judge if a new confirmation changes the tradeoffs among the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
After brief external training, errors in core tasks dropped sharply.
A new project was cancelled, so the work in the proposed alternative role disappeared.
Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
How does the community justify time not worked?
An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.
A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.The record of this question
- Question
FSP-WORK-20· version 1.5.0- Content identity, SHA-256
bcf53a48353a16171a43907e824554bb61af79a82086031ee81446b240abb102- Input files
- Question input JSON · What followed, JSON