These are the records this paper read, word for word in its English translation of the Korean originals: for each of the twelve cases, its situation, what it says is unknown, when it would be reopened and what it would observe, with the assumptions its run states and its run's reading of its own result. Passages already quoted in chapter 1 are not repeated here. Every case is an authored synthetic case from AEGIS's calculation programme (AEGIS-CALC-v1), not a real event, and every cost, unit and schedule in it is the author's assumption.
Domestic production of core parts
An authored synthetic case (AEG-K-056), filed under budget, whose deciding role is the acquisition cost analyst (setting) and whose run, on an avoidable cost of 2000, a remaining cost of 600 and an exit cost of 400 (hundred million won), reports a net saving of 1000.
The costs added for verification and certification before mass production, and the results of parts reliability tests
If the remaining and closing costs or the exit cost rise sharply, calculate again.
Record whether the actual costs required while the first project proceeds diverge from the net saving calculation.
The avoidable import cost of 2000 hundred million won and the remaining and closing costs of 600 and 400 hundred million won are values assumed by the author. They are not actual data from a domestic production project.
Remodelling ageing base facilities
An authored synthetic case (AEG-K-057), filed under facilities and energy, whose deciding role is the facility planning officer (setting) and whose run, on an avoidable cost of 150, a remaining cost of 90 and an exit cost of 20 (hundred million won), reports a net saving of 40.
The life of the equipment after remodelling and changes in annual upkeep costs
If the demolition and exit costs grow and the net saving disappears, open it again.
Record whether the actual costs spent during the remodelling work match the calculation of the remaining cost.
The avoidable new construction cost of 150 hundred million won and the remodelling remaining cost of 90 hundred million won and exit cost of 20 hundred million won are values assumed by the author. They are not actual data from a facility deliberation.
Subtracting the remaining and exit costs, totalling 110 hundred million won, gives a calculated net saving from remodelling of 40 hundred million won.
Contracting out equipment maintenance
An authored synthetic case (AEG-K-058), filed under maintenance and life cycle, whose deciding role is the maintenance contracting officer (setting) and whose run, on an avoidable cost of 300, a remaining cost of 180 and an exit cost of 60 (hundred million won), reports a net saving of 60.
A plan is reviewed to switch the maintenance of some equipment from the internal maintenance depot to private contracting. The internal requirement that contracting can avoid is 300 hundred million won a year, while the remaining cost of the contract is calculated at 180 hundred million won a year and the cost of returning equipment and materials and of exit at 60 hundred million won a year. A net saving of 60 hundred million won a year is derived, and the quality of contracting and protection against technology leakage must be reviewed together.
If a fall in contracting quality or signs of technology leakage are confirmed, open it again.
The avoidable internal requirement of 300 hundred million won a year and the contracting remaining cost of 180 hundred million won a year and exit cost of 60 hundred million won a year are values assumed by the author. They are not actual data from a contracting deliberation.
Subtracting the remaining and exit costs, totalling 240 hundred million won a year, gives a calculated net saving from the switch to contracting of 60 hundred million won a year.
Reserve mobilisation plan
An authored synthetic case (AEG-K-059), filed under budget, whose deciding role is the reserve forces planning officer (setting) and whose run, on an avoidable cost of 500, a remaining cost of 300 and an exit cost of 50 (hundred million won), reports a net saving of 150.
The costs are examined of a plan to bring forward the mobilisation of reserve units in the logistics and medical fields. The standing personnel requirement that mobilisation can avoid is 500 hundred million won, while the remaining cost of mobilisation is calculated at 300 hundred million won and the cost of release from call-up and of exit at 50 hundred million won. A net saving of 150 hundred million won comes out, but the training requirement of mobilisation and securing quarters for the troops are the key.
The training requirement of mobilisation and the number of people the quarters that can be secured can hold
If the size of the mobilised personnel or the training requirement changes, calculate again.
Record whether the costs actually spent in the first year of mobilisation diverge from the calculation of the remaining cost.
The avoidable requirement of 500 hundred million won and the mobilisation remaining cost of 300 hundred million won and exit cost of 50 hundred million won are values assumed by the author. They are not actual mobilisation cost data.
Subtracting the remaining and exit costs, totalling 350 hundred million won, gives a calculated net saving from mobilisation of 150 hundred million won.
Logistics service contract
An authored synthetic case (AEG-K-060), filed under procurement and contracts, whose deciding role is the contract deliberation officer (setting) and whose run, on an avoidable cost of 90, a remaining cost of 120 and an exit cost of 10 (hundred million won), reports a net saving of -40.
The terms of re-contracting, the performance capacity of a new operator, and whether the penalty clause applies
If the unit price of a new operator goes beyond the calculation of the remaining cost, judge again.
Record which side the amount spent on the new contract after the switch to re-contracting falls on compared with keeping.
The avoidable 90 hundred million won and the renewal remaining cost of 120 hundred million won and penalty closing cost of 10 hundred million won are values assumed by the author. They are not actual data from a contract deliberation.
Subtracting the remaining and closing costs, totalling 130 hundred million won, gives a calculated net saving of -40 hundred million won, that is, a net cost of keeping of 40 hundred million won.
Bringing contracted maintenance in-house
An authored synthetic case (AEG-K-108), filed under budget, whose deciding role is the maintenance project budget officer (setting) and whose run, on an avoidable cost of 120, a remaining cost of 70 and an exit cost of 10 (hundred million won), reports a net saving of 40.
A plan is reviewed to switch some maintenance work from outside contracting to an in-house cooperation system. The contracting cost that the switch can avoid was assumed at 120 hundred million won a year, the remaining cost left at 70 hundred million won a year, and the contract exit cost at 10 hundred million won a year. It is calculated at a net saving of 40 hundred million won a year.
The cost of training in-house cooperation staff, the terms for ending the contracting contract, and a fall in the operating rate early in the switch
Record whether the saving against the actual requirement each quarter after the switch diverges from the calculated figure
The avoided 120 hundred million won, the remaining 70 hundred million won and the exit 10 hundred million won are all values assumed by the author and not actual budget data.
Subtracting the remaining and exit costs, totalling 80 hundred million won, gives a calculated net saving of 40 hundred million won a year, which becomes the grounds for judging whether to switch.
Joint purchasing
An authored synthetic case (AEG-K-109), filed under procurement and contracts, whose deciding role is the materiel procurement officer (setting) and whose run, on an avoidable cost of 260, a remaining cost of 180 and an exit cost of 30 (hundred million won), reports a net saving of 50.
Several units have bought the same materiel in dispersed purchases. The cost of duplicate acquisition that the switch to joint purchasing can avoid was assumed at 260 hundred million won, the remaining cost left at the integrated unit price at 180 hundred million won, and the exit cost of settling existing contracts at 30 hundred million won. It is calculated at a net saving of 50 hundred million won.
Changes in the size of requirements by unit, the result of negotiating the integrated unit price, and the contract exit procedure
Record each quarter whether the saving after the switch diverges from the calculated figure
The avoided 260 hundred million won, the remaining 180 hundred million won and the exit 30 hundred million won are all values assumed by the author and not actual procurement data.
Subtracting the remaining and exit costs, totalling 210 hundred million won, gives a calculated net saving of 50 hundred million won, which becomes the cost basis for the switch to joint purchasing.
Online education
An authored synthetic case (AEG-K-141), filed under budget, whose deciding role is the education budget analyst and whose run, on an avoidable cost of 48, a remaining cost of 12 and an exit cost of 8 (hundred million won), reports a net saving of 28.
If collective education is switched to online education, the avoidable cost is calculated at 48 hundred million won. A remaining cost of 12 hundred million won that is kept even after the switch and a closing cost of 8 hundred million won for existing contracts are left, and the net saving is 28 hundred million won. Whether the effect of education is kept is to be confirmed and the switch decided.
Differences in completion rates and results after online education, and additional introduction costs
Record education spending and completion rates before and after the switch to verify the net saving.
The avoided 48 hundred million won, the remaining 12 hundred million won and the closing 8 hundred million won are values assumed by the author.
Subtracting the remaining and closing costs, totalling 20 hundred million won, gives a calculated net saving of 28 hundred million won.
Contracting out a medical post
An authored synthetic case (AEG-K-142), filed under personnel and welfare, whose deciding role is the medical operations planning officer and whose run, on an avoidable cost of 96, a remaining cost of 24 and an exit cost of 16 (hundred million won), reports a net saving of 56.
A plan is reviewed to switch medical support for units from building in-house medical posts to private contracting. The construction cost avoided by the switch to contracting is 96 hundred million won, and a remaining cost of 24 hundred million won and a closing cost of 16 hundred million won are left. A net saving of 56 hundred million won is produced, but the quality of contracted care must be confirmed together.
The quality of care of the contracted medical institutions and the sustainability of the contract
Record the number of consultations and the costs after the switch to contracting to verify the net saving estimate.
The avoided 96 hundred million won, the remaining 24 hundred million won and the closing 16 hundred million won are values assumed by the author.
Subtracting the remaining and closing costs, totalling 40 hundred million won, gives a calculated net saving of 56 hundred million won.
In-house medical supplies
An authored synthetic case (AEG-K-171), filed under budget, whose deciding role is the medical supplies budget officer and whose run, on an avoidable cost of 400, a remaining cost of 250 and an exit cost of 30 (hundred million won), reports a net saving of 120.
If the requirement for medical supplies changes, open the net saving calculation again.
Arrange the avoided, arising and remaining cost items and record the net saving calculation.
The avoided cost of 400 hundred million won, the cost left after the switch of 250 hundred million won and the escape cost of 30 hundred million won are values assumed by the author.
With the net saving at the level of 120 hundred million won/year, it determines whether to switch and on what scale.
Facility relocation
An authored synthetic case (AEG-K-185), filed under budget, whose deciding role is the budget planning officer and whose run, on an avoidable cost of 200, a remaining cost of 120 and an exit cost of 40 (hundred million won), reports a net saving of 40.
Changes in lease and operating costs after relocation, the method of reckoning the vacating cost, and the time at which prices are reflected
If the relocation costs go beyond the estimate, calculate the keeping alternative again
Record the spending at each stage of relocation preparation against the budget
The upkeep 200 hundred million won, the remaining 120 hundred million won and the vacating 40 hundred million won are all values assumed by the author.
Energy equipment contracting
An authored synthetic case (AEG-K-186), filed under facilities and energy, whose deciding role is the facilities and energy officer and whose run, on an avoidable cost of 90, a remaining cost of 55 and an exit cost of 10 (hundred million won), reports a net saving of 25.
If the upkeep and replacement of energy-saving equipment is turned over to private contracting, the existing costs are avoided, but remaining costs and fees follow. A judgment is needed that calculates whether the net saving gained by contracting is enough and settles whether to switch.
The terms of the contracting contract, the measured values of the performance criteria, and the rate of increase in long-term upkeep costs
Record the amount saved after contracting compared with the contract criteria
The upkeep 90 hundred million won, the remaining 55 hundred million won and the fee 10 hundred million won are all values assumed by the author.
Because the net cost of contracting, 65 hundred million won, is smaller than the present upkeep cost of 90 hundred million won, a saving of 25 hundred million won is expected.