This appendix gives the thirteen inquiries the paper read, in the order of the case list, word for word in the English translation made once for this study from Dionyas's Korean. None carries a judgment or an actual figure; Dionyas publishes them as editorial question designs and does not say who drafted them. What a record says about a named artist, group, tour or date is its framing, not a fact checked here. A line the studio copies into every inquiry of the domain or of its industry series is given in full once, and named where it recurs.
Not one path
Dionyas inquiry inquiry:foresight:01 is a general review design that names no artist, work or market, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=inquiry%3Aforesight%3A01.
Not fixing the path to success as one
If a new artist's next year is divided into a popular hit, a small loyal audience, growth centred on live performance and a change of direction, what events would support or refute each path?
Hypotheses and future paths · a general review design. The artist, work, market and period it applies to are named when it is recorded.
Criteria, scenarios, counter-examples and follow-up observations fixed in advance
The subject under review, the period, the terms of comparison and counter-examples
Does not call symbols, metaphors or scenarios verified predictions or formulas for success.
Question designed · awaiting inquiry
Criteria set in advance
Dionyas inquiry inquiry:foresight:02 is a general review design that names no artist, work or market, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=inquiry%3Aforesight%3A02; its two needs and its boundary are the domain's lines, word for word as given under Not one path.
Criteria of success for content, set in advance
If, before a new video is released, its goal is divided into views, repeat viewing, listening to the music and remembering the name, what would have to appear for the hypothesis of success to be revised?
Hypotheses and future paths · a general review design. The artist, work, market and period it applies to are named when it is recorded.
Question designed · awaiting inquiry
The window of the wave
Dionyas inquiry inquiry:foresight:03 is a general review design that names no artist, work or market, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=inquiry%3Aforesight%3A03; its two needs and its boundary are the domain's lines, word for word as given under Not one path.
If the window of the wave is fixed first
If the start, the peak and the end are fixed before the flow of interest after a tour is read as a wave, what differs from an explanation that changes the window after seeing the result?
Hypotheses and future paths · a general review design. The artist, work, market and period it applies to are named when it is recorded.
Question designed · awaiting inquiry
Fibonacci as metaphor
Dionyas inquiry inquiry:foresight:04 is a general review design that names no artist, work or market, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=inquiry%3Aforesight%3A04; its two needs and its boundary are the domain's lines, word for word as given under Not one path.
How to keep Fibonacci a metaphor
When levels of 0.382·0.618 are laid exploratorily over observed increases, how should the limit, that they are not a rate of fan loss, a probability or a verified rule, be recorded clearly?
Hypotheses and future paths · a general review design. The artist, work, market and period it applies to are named when it is recorded.
Question designed · awaiting inquiry
Right result, wrong reason
Dionyas inquiry inquiry:foresight:05 is a general review design that names no artist, work or market, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=inquiry%3Aforesight%3A05; its two needs and its boundary are the domain's lines, word for word as given under Not one path.
A prediction can come true and its process still be wrong
If the commercial success that was expected actually happened but its reason was an entirely different event, how should hitting the result and the explanatory power of the hypothesis be assessed separately?
Hypotheses and future paths · a general review design. The artist, work, market and period it applies to are named when it is recorded.
Question designed · awaiting inquiry
Knowing early
Dionyas inquiry inquiry:foresight:06 is a general review design that names no artist, work or market, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=inquiry%3Aforesight%3A06; its two needs and its boundary are the domain's lines, word for word as given under Not one path.
Observations that show early that one was wrong
When a hypothesis of an artist's expansion abroad is set up, what counter-examples, lack of persistence and local response call for a change of judgment before a rise in the rankings does?
Hypotheses and future paths · a general review design. The artist, work, market and period it applies to are named when it is recorded.
Question designed · awaiting inquiry
Colliding futures
Dionyas inquiry inquiry:foresight:07 is a general review design that names no artist, work or market, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=inquiry%3Aforesight%3A07; its two needs and its boundary are the domain's lines, word for word as given under Not one path.
A future where perspectives collide
When the fandom wants the relationship to deepen, the investment perspective wants scale to expand and the creator wants to experiment, how should the difference in reading the same future as different successes be preserved?
Hypotheses and future paths · a general review design. The artist, work, market and period it applies to are named when it is recorded.
Question designed · awaiting inquiry
From market to creation
Dionyas inquiry inquiry:foresight:08 is a general review design that names no artist, work or market, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=inquiry%3Aforesight%3A08; its two needs and its boundary are the domain's lines, word for word as given under Not one path.
When crossing from market judgment to creation
When observations of market reputation are linked with Skeptron's intuitive inquiry, can new questions be given to creative choices while fact, interpretation and symbol are kept?
Hypotheses and future paths · a general review design. The artist, work, market and period it applies to are named when it is recorded.
Question designed · awaiting inquiry
After the concerts
Dionyas inquiry case:arirang-waves is an editorial case that names BTS and a tour and enters no actual figures, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=case%3Aarirang-waves.
BTS: when the concerts end, does the fandom stay?
When the end date of the North American leg of BTS's ‘ARIRANG’ in 2026 is fixed as T0, is the flow of US search interest and YouTube views over the following 12 weeks closer to the 0.382·0.618 retracement scenario set in advance or to a simple trend?
BTS · the United States · an exploratory design covering the 12 weeks after the end of the North American leg, no actual figures entered
Permitted aggregates of fan activity with the same definition, time zone and interval
The chosen leg of the tour and the reference point set in advance
The ratio and wave assumptions, the basis of comparison, the date of review, the conditions of invalidation
A candidate for linking with Skeptron · not a scientifically verified prediction of fandom or a probability of success. A result reached by picking only the cases where the ratios fit, or by moving the window after the fact, is recorded separately.
Sources under review · interpretation and hypothesis kept apart
The end of the tour
Dionyas inquiry case:industry-bts-tour-ending-window is a designed case of the studio's industry series, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=case%3Aindustry-bts-tour-ending-window.
The BTS ARIRANG tour: which day to take as the end of the tour
How do the scenarios of fan activity differ when the end of the North American leg and the end of the whole tour are set as different reference dates? What must be recorded first so that the reference date is not moved to fit the observed results?
The officially confirmed schedule and observation city by city in North America · 12 weeks before and after · inquiry design · awaiting judgment
Criteria, scenarios, counter-examples and follow-up observations fixed in advance
Sources and access rights fitting the stated subject, period and country; items not provided stay missing
Does not call symbols, metaphors or scenarios verified predictions or formulas for success. The number of questions is not the amount of data obtained or the number of judgments. Only permitted public material and aggregates with consent and authority are used.
Question registered · awaiting judgment
Before the wave
Dionyas inquiry case:industry-symbolic-scenarios-elliott is a designed case of the studio's industry series, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=case%3Aindustry-symbolic-scenarios-elliott; its two needs are the series' lines, word for word as given under The end of the tour.
The Elders–Palantir link: what must be set before looking at the wave
If an Elliott-style path is assumed for the public indicators of activity after the BTS tour, what must first be fixed as the start, the end and the criterion of failure? Can an interpretation made after the fact be kept from being shown as a prediction made in advance?
A candidate for linking with Skeptron · an independent inquiry of symbol and intuition · inquiry design · awaiting judgment
Does not call symbols, metaphors or scenarios verified predictions or formulas for success. The number of questions is not the amount of data obtained or the number of judgments. Only permitted public material and aggregates with consent and authority are used.
Question registered · awaiting judgment
Without ratios
Dionyas inquiry case:industry-symbolic-scenarios-fibonacci is a designed case of the studio's industry series, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=case%3Aindustry-symbolic-scenarios-fibonacci; its two needs are the series' lines, word for word as given under The end of the tour.
The Elders–Palantir link: set against an explanation without ratios
When levels of 0.382·0.618 are applied exploratorily to increases in fan activity, over what identical window should they be compared with scenarios of simple persistence and trend? Can choosing only the cases that fit be avoided?
A candidate for linking with Skeptron · an independent inquiry of symbol and intuition · inquiry design · awaiting judgment
Does not call symbols, metaphors or scenarios verified predictions or formulas for success. The number of questions is not the amount of data obtained or the number of judgments. Only permitted public material and aggregates with consent and authority are used.
Question registered · awaiting judgment
Market and production
Dionyas inquiry case:industry-rookie-training-separation is a designed case of the studio's industry series, with no judgment, at https://dionyas.risconlabs.com/research?inquiry=case%3Aindustry-rookie-training-separation; its two needs are the series' lines, word for word as given under The end of the tour.
Finding new artists and the growth of expression: the line between market observation and production decisions
When Dionyas's market questions are sent into Skeptron's creative context, what among source, assumption and uncertainty must be preserved? What boundary should be set so that a market response does not lead straight to the approval of a production?
Public works such as RESCENE's for reference · a separate creative study based on consent · inquiry design · awaiting judgment
Does not call symbols, metaphors or scenarios verified predictions or formulas for success. The number of questions is not the amount of data obtained or the number of judgments. Only permitted public material and aggregates with consent and authority are used.
Question registered · awaiting judgment