A finding is always made somewhere: on one factory floor, in two hospitals, in an experiment. Using it elsewhere is a decision, and the record of that decision rarely says how far the finding was allowed to go. This short study reads sixteen public records that make such decisions in writing. They are GAEKJU's outside cases on the domain question, "Is it the same across domains?": each is GAEKJU's own summary of one or two published studies, set beside another workplace, with three readings, a lean, a dated judgment, a condition that would show the judgment wrong, and a proposal. The cases are summaries, not the studies, and this study claims nothing about the studies beyond what the cases say.
The cases carry a finding only as far as a likeness they name, and most of them say what the study did not measure. One study, of everyday resistance in a Malaysian village, is carried to three questions and lands on three different readings. Most of the tests that would reopen a judgment must be made in the workplace the finding was carried to, yet no case says by when, and only one says who would make it. Read against the debate on external validity and on conceptual stretching, the cases show a written form of transfer that keeps "there" and "here" apart, and the gap that form still leaves.