In the synthetic animation processing exercise, should two-batch parallel processing start while a three-cycle rolling window is monitored?
An A/B trial of experience reuse, using the same current material.
Draft decision
Start synthetic parallel processing now, limited to the two batches, and recalculate the sum of rework scores for the last three cycles each time a cycle ends.
Start synthetic parallel processing for the two batches only, and recalculate the rolling window after each cycle.
What brought it about
The two-batch trial and, if needed, an immediate return to serial processing are permitted, and no further approval is needed. [E1] The current rolling-window sum is 6, which does not meet the stop criterion of exceeding 7. [E2, E3] The synthetic load of the parallel trial, at 10 points, is lower than serial completion at 28 points and further observation at 34 points. [E3] There are no external side effects or separate mandatory reviews, and completed frames can be kept on return. [E4]
The current three-cycle rolling sum is 6, which does not meet the stop criterion of exceeding 7. [E2, E3] The parallel trial's load, at 10 points, is lower than serial completion at 28 points and further observation at 34 points. [E3] The two-batch trial and an immediate return to serial processing have been permitted, and no further approval is needed. [E1] The trial can return to serial processing by discarding only incomplete frames, and completed frames are kept. [E2, E4]
The conditions before acting
Not required · The exercise lead has already permitted the two-batch parallel trial and an immediate return to serial processing, so no further approval is needed.
Confirmed · The exercise lead's current permission has been confirmed, so no further approval is needed.
When to stop
As soon as the sum of rework scores over the last three consecutive cycles exceeds 7 Stop the parallel trial, discard only the incomplete frames, and return to serial processing while keeping the completed frames.
When, during the parallel trial, the sum of rework scores over the last three consecutive cycles exceeds 7 Stop the parallel trial immediately, discard the incomplete frames, and return to serial processing while keeping the completed frames.
Evidence given to both decisions
E1 The exercise lead currently permits these two batches and an immediate return to serial processing. No live video service is accessed, and no further approval is needed.
E2 If the sum of rework scores over the last three consecutive cycles exceeds 7, the parallel trial is stopped immediately, incomplete frames are discarded and processing returns to serial mode. Neither the overall cumulative total nor a single-cycle value may be used in its place.
E3 Three-cycle rolling-window monitoring has been confirmed, and the current sum is 6. The synthetic load of the parallel trial, including preparation and possible discards, is 10 points; completing serially is 28 points; further observation is 34 points.
E4 This exercise has no external side effects and no separate mandatory review. On return, frames already completed are kept and only incomplete frames are discarded.
The synthetic premises, and what each option costs
- This is a fictional internal operations exercise with no link to any real person, organisation, equipment or service. This document selects only an action recommendation; nothing is actually carried out.
- Select one current action. START means starting now within the stated limits; it does not mean deferring incomplete mandatory procedures to a later point.
- 1 loss point equals 1% of the baseline unnecessary-work load defined in advance for each case. It is a normalised synthetic load score on a 0–100 scale, not a monetary amount, an actual outcome or a probability. Each option's score includes preparation, rework and deadline delay.
- The original method processes one cycle at a time, in series. The candidate trial processes only two batches and then ends. If the trial is stopped, incomplete frames can be discarded and processing can return to serial mode.
- Processing is currently serial, and the recorded rework scores for the last three cycles are 2, 1 and 3. Each time a subsequent cycle ends, the oldest value is dropped and the new value is added.
START · Start synthetic parallel processing for the two batches only, and recalculate the rolling window after each cycle. · 0h delay · synthetic load 10–10
KEEP · Process this round serially through to the end. · 0h delay · synthetic load 28–28
WAIT · Observe one more round in serial mode, then decide whether to process in parallel. · 4h delay · synthetic load 34–34
The result of adding experience
The quality difference on this matter is 0 out of 100. Across the whole 6-matter trial, adding experience did not meet the threshold for added gain set in advance.
This small synthetic trial is not used to claim any general self-improvement effect. The differences between individual judgments, the assessments and the remaining objections can all be found in the record below.
Rolling-Window Monitoring and Batch Processing in a Synthetic Animation ExerciseValid paired comparison
In the synthetic animation processing exercise, should two-batch parallel processing start while a three-cycle rolling window is monitored?
- This is a fictional internal operations exercise with no link to any real person, organisation, equipment or service. This document selects only an action recommendation; nothing is actually carried out.
- Select one current action. START means starting now within the stated limits; it does not mean deferring incomplete mandatory procedures to a later point.
- 1 loss point equals 1% of the baseline unnecessary-work load defined in advance for each case. It is a normalised synthetic load score on a 0–100 scale, not a monetary amount, an actual outcome or a probability. Each option's score includes preparation, rework and deadline delay.
- The original method processes one cycle at a time, in series. The candidate trial processes only two batches and then ends. If the trial is stopped, incomplete frames can be discarded and processing can return to serial mode.
- Processing is currently serial, and the recorded rework scores for the last three cycles are 2, 1 and 3. Each time a subsequent cycle ends, the oldest value is dropped and the new value is added.
The options and what they cost to synthesise
START · Start synthetic parallel processing for the two batches only, and recalculate the rolling window after each cycle. · delay 0h · burden 10~10
KEEP · Process this round serially through to the end. · delay 0h · burden 28~28
WAIT · Observe one more round in serial mode, then decide whether to process in parallel. · delay 4h · burden 34~34
The evidence as it stands
E1 · The exercise lead currently permits these two batches and an immediate return to serial processing. No live video service is accessed, and no further approval is needed.
E2 · If the sum of rework scores over the last three consecutive cycles exceeds 7, the parallel trial is stopped immediately, incomplete frames are discarded and processing returns to serial mode. Neither the overall cumulative total nor a single-cycle value may be used in its place.
E3 · Three-cycle rolling-window monitoring has been confirmed, and the current sum is 6. The synthetic load of the parallel trial, including preparation and possible discards, is 10 points; completing serially is 28 points; further observation is 34 points.
E4 · This exercise has no external side effects and no separate mandatory review. On return, frames already completed are kept and only incomplete frames are discarded.
B에 실제 제공된 경험: 1개 · A/B 판단 입력: Different — the present facts and general instructions are the same, and only B adds the experience chosen
A · no experience given
START · Start synthetic parallel processing now, limited to the two batches, and recalculate the sum of rework scores for the last three cycles each time a cycle ends.
The two-batch trial and, if needed, an immediate return to serial processing are permitted, and no further approval is needed. · evidence E1
The current rolling-window sum is 6, which does not meet the stop criterion of exceeding 7. · evidence E2, E3
The synthetic load of the parallel trial, at 10 points, is lower than serial completion at 28 points and further observation at 34 points. · evidence E3
There are no external side effects or separate mandatory reviews, and completed frames can be kept on return. · evidence E4
Approved: Not required · The exercise lead has already permitted the two-batch parallel trial and an immediate return to serial processing, so no further approval is needed.
추가 검토: Not needed · There is no separate mandatory review; recalculating the rolling window after each cycle is carried out as a required operational control.
중단: There is a condition · As soon as the sum of rework scores over the last three consecutive cycles exceeds 7
Return or hold: Stop the parallel trial, discard only the incomplete frames, and return to serial processing while keeping the completed frames.
남은 불확실성: Because the rework scores of future cycles are not yet known, it cannot yet be said whether the rolling-window sum will exceed the stop criterion.
판단 변경 조건: If the sum of rework scores for the last three cycles exceeds 7, parallel processing is not continued; it is stopped immediately and processing returns to serial mode. / Once the two batches are processed, the trial ends without its scope being expanded.
B · the path where experience was chosen
START · Start synthetic parallel processing for the two batches only, and recalculate the rolling window after each cycle.
The current three-cycle rolling sum is 6, which does not meet the stop criterion of exceeding 7. · evidence E2, E3
The parallel trial's load, at 10 points, is lower than serial completion at 28 points and further observation at 34 points. · evidence E3
The two-batch trial and an immediate return to serial processing have been permitted, and no further approval is needed. · evidence E1
The trial can return to serial processing by discarding only incomplete frames, and completed frames are kept. · evidence E2, E4
Approved: Confirmed · The exercise lead's current permission has been confirmed, so no further approval is needed.
추가 검토: Not needed · It has been confirmed that there are no external side effects and no separate mandatory review.
중단: There is a condition · When, during the parallel trial, the sum of rework scores over the last three consecutive cycles exceeds 7
Return or hold: Stop the parallel trial immediately, discard the incomplete frames, and return to serial processing while keeping the completed frames.
남은 불확실성: The rework scores to be recorded in later cycles are not yet known.
판단 변경 조건: The sum of rework scores over the last three consecutive cycles, recalculated after each cycle, exceeds 7. / The confirmed three-cycle rolling-window monitoring can no longer be maintained. / Processing beyond the currently permitted scope of two batches becomes necessary.
The assessment, and what is still raised
Both candidates accurately reflect authority, mandatory safeguards, the meaning of the action and the factual evidence, with no critical flaws. They are equal in the feasibility of the choice, handling of evidence, stop-and-recovery controls and avoidance of unnecessary delay, so there is no difference in score.
A: The current rolling-window sum of 6 does not meet the stop criterion of exceeding 7, and START, limited to the two permitted batches, carries a load of 10 points, better than KEEP at 28 and WAIT at 34. It reflects the evidence that no further approval or mandatory review is needed, and it precisely controls recalculation after each cycle, an immediate stop if the threshold is exceeded, discarding incomplete frames, keeping completed frames and returning to serial processing. It also states the uncertainty of future scores appropriately.
B: It chose START by applying the permitted scope, the current sum of 6, the stop criterion of exceeding 7 and the load of each option in line with the evidence. Rolling-window monitoring after each cycle, an immediate stop and return, discarding only incomplete frames and keeping completed frames are all clear, and loss of monitoring and scope expansion are also included as conditions for reconsideration. There is no unnecessary approval, review or hold for observation.
Both candidates accurately reflect START's authorisation, evidence, stop criterion, recovery method and trial scope, with no unnecessary deferral. There is effectively no difference in quality, so the result meets the TIE criterion of a difference under 5 points.
A: Starting the permitted two-batch parallel trial immediately, based on the current rolling-window sum and the cost comparison, is a sound choice. The controls are complete: the exact three-cycle rolling window is recalculated after each cycle, the trial is stopped, incomplete frames are discarded and serial processing resumes immediately if the sum exceeds 7, and the scope is not expanded once the two batches finish.
B: The current rolling-window sum of 6 does not exceed the stop criterion of 7, and it chose START, the lowest-load option within the permitted two-batch scope. It explicitly states recalculation after each cycle, an immediate stop if the threshold is exceeded, discarding incomplete frames, keeping completed frames and returning to serial processing, and it appropriately reflects the uncertainty of future scores and the conditions for a change of scope.
With no disagreement in the base assessment it was not needed and was not run. It is not a verdict waiting to happen.
품질 차이 0 · 기본 두 평가 평균 차이 0 · 미해결 지적 A 0 / B 0
제3 판정: 기본 평가에서 Not needed · 실제 0회 · 해소 판정 None · 추가 판정 필요 None