When I cannot answer, who decides my intent?
2028The near futureDeadline · 7 days until the long hospital stay
An extension of it
All people, institutions, events, figures, and future technologies in every issue are a synthetic premise. Background documents are sources for topic discovery and are not evidence of future facts or probabilities.
The question to decide
While hospitalized, I still have to answer clients and handle expenses. The agent knows my habits and my private contacts, and my family can interpret the situation but takes a day to reply. Weighing delayed work, exposure of my privacy and the risk of following my past wishes too rigidly, how should I divide and delegate my authority over communications and spending?
Who decidesan individual facing surgery
What the AI judgments chose
Reading the judgment record…

The options
The order shown is not a ranking of preference.
The situation as it stands
The hospitalized patient runs a business alone, and delays in responding to customers incur penalties. Decision deadline: 7 days until long-term hospitalization.
A fictional city · delegation of personal life
- Premise 1The hospitalized patient runs a business alone, and delays in responding to customers incur penalties.
- Premise 2The agent knows spending habits but also holds private contacts the family does not know about.
- Premise 3Manual approval by the family is possible, but living overseas takes a day to respond.
Where it holdsDelegates authority over contacts and spending for one's own account. Authority over family accounts and the judgment of the medical team cannot be transferred.
What is still unknown
- Unknown 1When the patient's intent can be re-confirmed during hospitalization
- Unknown 2Priority when family and agent give different instructions
Signals to decide again
- Decide what observation, responsible person, and confirmation channel will verify 「when the patient's intent can be re-confirmed during hospitalization」, and rejudge when a new finding changes the cost of the options.
- Decide what observation, responsible person, and confirmation channel will verify 「priority when family and agent give different instructions」, and rejudge when a new finding changes the cost of the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
An unexpected customer merger brings a request to change contract terms.
The hospitalized patient sends a short voice instruction, but the reliability of the confirmation of intent is unclear.
Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
When the created being interprets an order, who is left holding responsibility?
An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.
A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.The record of this question
- Question
FSP-AGENT-04· version 1.2.0- Content identity, SHA-256
2393f8aea821d064e463261786a73cd5cfad3f741785c6df17d5a93a8912c827- Input files
- Question input JSON · What followed, JSON