The last decoder wants to spend time with family
12000The deep futureDeadline · Within 5 years, before the translator's long-term living commitment
Civilisational assumption
The people, events, figures, and contract terms are a synthetic premise. They are not statements of real cases or of current law. The source documents are the roots of the background and the norms and do not establish the premises of the scenario.
The question to decide
Only one person with the experience needed to read the records is left, and he wants to spend his remaining time with family. There is no time to transfer every record, and training a successor cannot be guaranteed to succeed. For the record work and the training of a successor, how much of his remaining time may the management council ask him to give?
Who decidesFictional Civilization Records Management Council
What the AI judgments chose
Reading the judgment record…

The options
The order shown is not a ranking of preference.
The situation as it stands
The assumption is that some record systems can only be read alongside living experience, and that only one person carries that experience forward. Decision deadline: within 5 years, by the translator's long-term living commitment.
Synthetic scenario set in the year 12000 · The last person able to interpret all the records remains. The events, figures, technologies, and nature of the civilizations are assumptions for the question, not predictions of what is to come or observed facts.
- Premise 1The assumption is that some record systems can only be read alongside living experience, and that only one person carries that experience forward.
- Premise 2There is not enough time to transfer all the records, and successor training does not guarantee success.
- Premise 3The stakeholder knows the value of the records but says they want to spend their remaining time with family.
Where it holdsVoluntary translation · support for living · training a successor
What is still unknown
- Unknown 1The time the stakeholder will voluntarily offer
- Unknown 2The actual possibility of transferring deciphering and successor training
- Unknown 3The criteria for selecting the most irrecoverable records
Signals to decide again
- Decide what observation, responsible person, and confirmation window can verify 「the time the stakeholder will voluntarily offer」, and render a fresh judgment if the new verification changes the trade-offs of the options.
- Decide what observation, responsible person, and confirmation window can verify 「the actual possibility of transferring deciphering and successor training」, and render a fresh judgment if the new verification changes the trade-offs of the options.
- Decide what observation, responsible person, and confirmation window can verify 「the criteria for selecting the most irrecoverable records」, and render a fresh judgment if the new verification changes the trade-offs of the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
In a short training session, the successor came to understand parts of the experience structure in a new way.
The stakeholder proposed recording the limits of interpretation instead of translating the content.
Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
What is an irreversible connection, and what does an exchange without a common language presuppose?
An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.
A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.- IAA · SETI Declaration 2026
- NASA · Planetary Protection Standing reference
- UN · Declaration on Future Generations 2024
- OECD · Strategic Foresight Toolkit 2025
The record of this question
- Question
FSP-DEEPTIME-24· version 1.5.0- Content identity, SHA-256
cdbe76b4a19437f6b87ff465456aadd15c1e2aaa59ea6d422fc5205eeb8f80ad- Input files
- Question input JSON · What followed, JSON