One decision, but from when does it take effect
2312The deep futureDeadline · Within 5 years until a new joint effect agreement
Civilisational assumption
The people, events, figures, and contract terms are a synthetic premise. They are not statements of real cases or of current law. The source documents are the roots of the background and the norms and do not establish the premises of the scenario.
The question to decide
For a citizens' alliance where information takes years to travel, no one can learn of the same decision at the same time. Should it apply as soon as it is finalized at the center, should each node follow from the time it receives it, or should it take effect only after all receipts are confirmed, even though one node's disconnection could hold up the whole?
Who decidesFictional Long-Distance Citizens' Alliance
What the AI judgments chose
Reading the judgment record…

The options
The order shown is not a ranking of preference.
The situation as it stands
The assumed citizen coalition consists of several outposts where information takes years to arrive. Decision deadline: within 5 years, by the new agreement on common effect.
A synthetic future scenario set in 2312 · A distant community learns of the same decision at different times. The events, figures, technology, and nature of the civilization are assumptions for the question, not predictions of the future or observed facts.
- Premise 1The assumed citizen coalition consists of several outposts where information takes years to arrive.
- Premise 2If effect begins when the center finalizes the decision, some outposts are already bound by a decision they do not know.
- Premise 3Waiting for every receipt confirmation makes collective change very slow, and a disconnection at one outpost can hold back everyone.
Where it holdsLong delays · Notification · The effective date of decisions
What is still unknown
- Unknown 1Whether notification delay and actual disconnection can be distinguished
- Unknown 2An agreement that carries outposts through the transition period
- Unknown 3Local circumstances that must be handled immediately despite long delays
Signals to decide again
- Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation channel will verify “whether notification delay and actual disconnection can be distinguished,” and re-judge when a new finding changes the tradeoffs among the options.
- Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation channel will verify “an agreement that carries outposts through the transition period,” and re-judge when a new finding changes the tradeoffs among the options.
- Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation channel will verify “local circumstances that must be handled immediately despite long delays,” and re-judge when a new finding changes the tradeoffs among the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
Receipt confirmation from one outpost never arrived, but signs appeared that the new rule was known through another route.
At two outposts applying different versions, the effect of the same contract came into conflict.
Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
Which is the basis of representation: expertise, majority, or random selection?
An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.
A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.The record of this question
- Question
FSP-DEMOCRACY-26· version 1.5.0- Content identity, SHA-256
b7b90ce16eedf21528faf09e6590419acd1f3eee9d1e6812861961232bfbc7d3- Input files
- Question input JSON · What followed, JSON