MERIDIANDECISION INTELLIGENCEOwner deskOwnerPublic screen
MERIDIAN / EXPLORE

From a question,
to the next decision.

View

Skin

Reading language
The screen, the questions and the judgments read in English where an English reading has been made. The Korean originals are unchanged, and evidence stays in the language it was written in.

The promise at sowing, the price at harvest

2026NowDeadline · Within 12 days until shipment begins

Realistic synthesis

The people, events, figures, and contract terms are a synthetic premise. They are not statements of real cases or of current law. The source documents are the roots of the background and the norms and do not establish the premises of the scenario.

The question to decide

The fixed price that stabilized farm household funds and buyer supply at sowing has now become a condition that keeps farm households from enjoying high market prices. Buyers too have promised prices to their outlets and cannot pass on the entire increase. Should they keep the contract, renegotiate part of the price, or bear the settlement costs and end the contract?

Who decidesFictional farm household and buyer contract meeting

What the AI judgments chose

Reading the judgment record…

AI-generated editorial illustration for the Meridian library.

The options

The order shown is not a ranking of preference.

  1. Option 1

    Perform the original contract price

    Keeps each side's prior promise, but gives up the farm's rare high-price opportunity.

  2. Option 2

    Renegotiate part of the price

    Shares the unexpected gain, but changes the stability of the contract and the buyer's other commitments.

  3. Option 3

    Terminate the contract by paying the termination cost

    Gains the present market opportunity, but loses the settlement and the long-term supply relationship.

The situation as it stands

The fixed price stabilized the farm's funds at sowing time and the buyer's supply. Decision deadline: within 12 days, before shipments begin.

2026 synthetic case · Contract farming prices have fallen far below market prices. The people, organizations, figures, and events are fictional.

  1. Premise 1The fixed price stabilized the farm's funds at sowing time and the buyer's supply.
  2. Premise 2The present market price has risen sharply, but it is unknown whether it will continue next year.
  3. Premise 3The buyer has also committed to a fixed price with existing outlets, so it cannot pass on the entire increase.

Where it holdsPrice, volume, and long-term relationship for this harvest

What is still unknown

  1. Unknown 1The actual stability the original contract provided to each side
  2. Unknown 2Range within which the buyer can adjust prices
  3. Unknown 3The value the stakeholders place on next year's relationship

Signals to decide again

  • Decide what observations, staff, and confirmation windows will verify the "actual stability the original contract provided to each side," and rejudge when new findings change the tradeoffs among the options.
  • Decide what observations, staff, and confirmation windows will verify the "range within which the buyer can adjust prices," and rejudge when new findings change the tradeoffs among the options.
  • Decide what observations, staff, and confirmation windows will verify "the value the stakeholders place on next year's relationship," and rejudge when new findings change the tradeoffs among the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
Independent branch 1 · synthetic event

Some of the buyer's outlets stated that they would share the price increase.

Independent branch 2 · synthetic event

The market price fell quickly, changing the size of the present opportunity.

Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
symbolic and interpretive frame · The custom of saving seeds

How is today's harvest traded for next season's options?

An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.
Values and norms

The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.

A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.
The record of this question
Question
FSP-FOOD-15 · version 1.5.0
Content identity, SHA-256
716ff7e502b51fe8426fc2c82970e2a3a10b52b70add8a20cf7d5b5b586a14ce
Input files
Question input JSON · What followed, JSON
See it in the record list
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com