MERIDIANDECISION INTELLIGENCEOwner deskOwnerPublic screen
My judgments
MERIDIAN / EXPLORE

From a question,
to the next decision.

View

Skin

YOUR DECISION WORKSPACEOwner onlyStart a new question Open my judgments →Owner operations desk →
Owner sign-in →Signed in as the ownerSign out — see what a visitor sees →End the Cloudflare Access session too →
Reading language
The screen, the questions and the judgments read in English where an English reading has been made. The Korean originals are unchanged, and evidence stays in the language it was written in.

The founder's free promise, the next operators' costs

2026NowDeadline · Within 45 days, before the new operating contract

Realistic synthesis

The people, events, figures, and contract terms are a synthetic premise. They are not statements of real cases or of current law. The source documents are the roots of the background and the norms and do not establish the premises of the scenario.

The question to decide

The founder promised early supporters they could keep using the facility for free, but left no written record of the period or the number of people. Some relied on that word and made no other arrangements, while the new operators' budget is short and paying users also bear costs. In the new operating contract, how should this promise be carried over or changed?

Who decidesFictional Shared Facility Succession Council

What the AI judgments chose

Reading the judgment record…

AI-generated editorial illustration for the Meridian library.

The options

The order shown is not a ranking of preference.

  1. Option 1

    Succeed to the free-use promise in full

    Carrying on long-standing trust, but new users also bear the unverified scope and the ongoing costs.

  2. Option 2

    End free use after a transition period

    Creating a new standard of operation, but imposing the cost of adaptation and loss on those who relied on the promise.

  3. Option 3

    Convert free use into a contribution of costs

    Dividing operating resources, but requiring existing users to accept conditions different from the original promise.

The situation as it stands

The fictional founder said those who helped early on could keep using it for free, but left no document of the period or the number of people. Decision deadline: within 45 days, by the new operating contract.

A 2026 synthetic matter · A departed founder's promise of free use is carried on by a new team. The people, organizations, figures, and events are fictional.

  1. Premise 1The fictional founder said those who helped early on could keep using it for free, but left no document of the period or the number of people.
  2. Premise 2The new team lacks the budget to support all users, and paying users are bearing different burdens.
  3. Premise 3Some users relied on the promise and made no other arrangements.

Where it holdsPast promise, free use, maintenance costs

What is still unknown

  1. Unknown 1Testimony that can verify the scope of the promise
  2. Unknown 2Actual reliance on free use
  3. Unknown 3Alternatives for users who cannot contribute in the required way

Signals to decide again

  • Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation window can verify the "testimony that can verify the scope of the promise," and re-judge if the new confirmation changes the tradeoffs of the options.
  • Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation window can verify the "actual reliance on free use," and re-judge if the new confirmation changes the tradeoffs of the options.
  • Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation window can verify the "alternatives for users who cannot contribute in the required way," and re-judge if the new confirmation changes the tradeoffs of the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
Independent branch 1 · synthetic event

An early patron presented a record showing that they had provided a large item on the premise of the promise.

Independent branch 2 · synthetic event

New paying users objected to the continuation of different conditions within the same facility.

Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
symbolic and interpretive frame · The story of Solomon's judgment

What losses does the very procedure for revealing the truth inflict on the stakeholder?

An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.
Values and norms

The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.

A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.
The record of this question
Question
FSP-JUSTICE-24 · version 1.5.0
Content identity, SHA-256
790d9ff65cd9b0145ed0b8444be60f09c128ba7fc6df545cd77d5c8f9f78d933
Input files
Question input JSON · What followed, JSON
See it in the record list
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com