MERIDIANDECISION INTELLIGENCEOwner deskOwnerPublic screen
My judgments
MERIDIAN / EXPLORE

From a question,
to the next decision.

View

Skin

YOUR DECISION WORKSPACEOwner onlyStart a new question Open my judgments →Owner operations desk →
Owner sign-in →Signed in as the ownerSign out — see what a visitor sees →End the Cloudflare Access session too →
Reading language
The screen, the questions and the judgments read in English where an English reading has been made. The Korean originals are unchanged, and evidence stays in the language it was written in.

May inspection records be used as evidence in a dispute

2026NowDeadline · Within 14 days, before the first mediation date

Realistic synthesis

The people, events, figures, and contract terms are a synthetic premise. They are not statements of real cases or of current law. The source documents are the roots of the background and the norms and do not establish the premises of the scenario.

The question to decide

Entry records kept for facility inspections could help identify the user present when the equipment was damaged, but they also capture the daily schedules of uninvolved people. Other evidence is incomplete, so without using the records the repair cost is likely to be a shared burden. How should it be judged whether to use these records, and if used, whether to make it contingent on the consent of those involved?

Who decidesFictional Shared Space Dispute Committee

What the AI judgments chose

Reading the judgment record…

AI-generated editorial illustration for the Meridian library.

The options

The order shown is not a ranking of preference.

  1. Option 1

    Use the relevant time segments in the review

    Verifies the facts of the dispute further, but takes on using records for a purpose different from the one originally agreed.

  2. Option 2

    Use only with the consent of those involved

    Checks willingness to use the records, but if consent is refused, fact-finding becomes uneven.

  3. Option 3

    Decide on other evidence alone

    Keeps within the boundary of the original purpose, but accepts uncertain liability and the loss of shared repair costs.

The situation as it stands

Fictional access records were kept for facility inspection, but could help identify who was present when the equipment was damaged. Decision deadline: within 14 days of the first mediation date.

2026 synthetic scenario · The evidence remains, but is used in a dispute different from the purpose of collection. The people, organizations, figures, and events are fictional.

  1. Premise 1Fictional access records were kept for facility inspection, but could help identify who was present when the equipment was damaged.
  2. Premise 2The records also include the daily living times of people unrelated to the dispute.
  3. Premise 3Other evidence is incomplete, and without using the records the equipment is likely to be repaired at shared cost.

Where it holdsUse of records, verification of the dispute, exposure of third parties

What is still unknown

  1. Unknown 1The scope of record use originally disclosed
  2. Unknown 2A way to separate information unrelated to the dispute
  3. Unknown 3Other material that distinguishes access from liability for the damage

Signals to decide again

  • Decide what observation, responsible person, and confirmation window can verify "the scope of record use originally disclosed," and re-judge when new findings change the tradeoffs among the options.
  • Decide what observation, responsible person, and confirmation window can verify "a way to separate information unrelated to the dispute," and re-judge when new findings change the tradeoffs among the options.
  • Decide what observation, responsible person, and confirmation window can verify "other material that distinguishes access from liability for the damage," and re-judge when new findings change the tradeoffs among the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
Independent branch 1 · synthetic event

A problem was found in which the access records were stored uniformly later than the actual times.

Independent branch 2 · synthetic event

A third party in the records objected to disclosure that they had visited.

Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
symbolic and interpretive frame · The story of Solomon's judgment

What losses does the very procedure for revealing the truth inflict on the stakeholder?

An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.
Values and norms

The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.

A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.
The record of this question
Question
FSP-JUSTICE-29 · version 1.5.0
Content identity, SHA-256
71cabfcdbd0732ee47ebe94ce1f89fc35a651646a65a60b123e4e2b7e84bd764
Input files
Question input JSON · What followed, JSON
See it in the record list
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com