Who decides the sensory texture of the performance
2049The middle futureDeadline · 30 days until ticket sales
A leap assumed
All people, institutions, events, figures, and future technologies in every issue are a synthetic premise. Background documents are sources for topic discovery and are not evidence of future facts or probabilities.
The question to decide
Whether devices that help regulate sensory intensity are used means some people experience the same performance differently. A single performance that includes the assistance designs a shared experience but narrows access for audience members who do not want it, while separating the performance from an experiment splits the cost and the audience. How will the producers include assistance in the work, and what choices will they leave open to the audience?
Who decidesPerformance producers joint meeting
What the AI judgments chose
Reading the judgment record…

The options
The order shown is not a ranking of preference.
The situation as it stands
In this setting, the performance device helps adjust the intensity of the sensations the audience feels. Decision deadline: 30 days until ticket sales.
Fictional sensory-assist performance venue
- Premise 1In this setting, the performance device helps adjust the intensity of the sensations the audience feels.
- Premise 2Audience members who do not use the assistance experience part of the same work in a different way.
- Premise 3Reviews of performances are often recorded without separating the effect of the work from the effect of the assistance device.
Where it holdsSets the sensory assistance for performances and the way audiences consent. It cannot control audience members' personal devices or their actual emotions.
What is still unknown
- Unknown 1How much the effects of assistance remain in the interpretation of the experience after the performance
- Unknown 2How audiences can compare other experiences before consenting
Signals to decide again
- Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation window will verify 「how much the effects of assistance remain in the interpretation of the experience after the performance」, and re-judge when a new finding changes the tradeoffs of the options.
- Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation window will verify 「how audiences can compare other experiences before consenting」, and re-judge when a new finding changes the tradeoffs of the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
Audiences who watched without assistance converge on interpretations that run in a different direction from the creator's intent.
The device provider offers support on the condition of later training use of audience response data.
Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
When play becomes the center of life, who has the right to change the rules?
An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.
A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.The record of this question
- Question
FSP-PLAY-05· version 1.2.0- Content identity, SHA-256
6761cef430336681033855b0d10dbec2d589c52ac01e42e34536ab747a046061- Input files
- Question input JSON · What followed, JSON