If a work not yet made looks like imitation
2140The deep futureDeadline · Decision deadline: 6 months until the first public exhibition
Civilisational assumption
The people, events, figures, and technology in this matter are stated assumptions. They are not to be treated as information about real individuals or as observed events. Background documents are separate sources, and symbolic interpretations are recorded as discovery paths.
The question to decide
What the fictional device shows is not the real future but possible works estimated from past work and interests. Publishing the images may offer inspiration, but it can shift creative direction and make later works look like imitation. To whom, and to what extent, should the trust show concrete images, production conditions, and possible paths?
Who decidesThe operating trust of a fictional creative path prediction bureau
What the AI judgments chose
Reading the judgment record…
The options
The order shown is not a ranking of preference.
The situation as it stands
A fictional device in 2140 proposes possible future work paths based on present studies and interests; it is not an actual observation of the future. Decision deadline: 6 months until the first public exhibition.
2140 fictional scenario · If you show a future work in advance, who will make it? The people, organizations, figures, and events are a synthetic premise constructed for comparison.
- Premise 1A fictional device in 2140 proposes possible future work paths based on present studies and interests; it is not an actual observation of the future.
- Premise 2A person who sees a specific work may try to complete it or avoid it, so the path the device described itself changes.
- Premise 3If the predicted image is known first, the creator's later work may be received as imitation.
Where it holdsImages of predicted works · Creators' consent · Explanations for the exhibition
What is still unknown
- Unknown 1The extent to which creators consent to the disclosure of their own predicted works
- Unknown 2The way the exhibition changes creative motivation and evaluation
- Unknown 3The rules for recording the relationship between the prediction and the actual work
Signals to decide again
- Decide what observation, owner, and check window will confirm 「the extent to which creators consent to the disclosure of their own predicted works」, and reconsider when a new confirmation changes the trade-offs of the options.
- Decide what observation, owner, and check window will confirm 「the way the exhibition changes creative motivation and evaluation」, and reconsider when a new confirmation changes the trade-offs of the options.
- Decide what observation, owner, and check window will confirm 「the rules for recording the relationship between the prediction and the actual work」, and reconsider when a new confirmation changes the trade-offs of the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
A writer in the pilot said that after seeing the predicted image, she began avoiding the same theme.
Viewers who saw the multiple possible paths became more curious about why the artist made the final choice.
Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
Does the choice to avoid a prophecy create the conditions for the prophecy?
An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.
A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.The record of this question
- Question
FSP-REFLEXIVE-12· version 1.4.0- Content identity, SHA-256
c7816f71fea32654ae05ec351a2cec1f1e9152ada4e46075e2a536402f5b5521- Input files
- Question input JSON · What followed, JSON