MERIDIANDECISION INTELLIGENCEOwner deskOwnerPublic screen
My judgments
MERIDIAN / EXPLORE

From a question,
to the next decision.

View

Skin

YOUR DECISION WORKSPACEOwner onlyStart a new question Open my judgments →Owner operations desk →
Owner sign-in →Signed in as the ownerSign out — see what a visitor sees →End the Cloudflare Access session too →
Reading language
The screen, the questions and the judgments read in English where an English reading has been made. The Korean originals are unchanged, and evidence stays in the language it was written in.

Kindness in the ratings, labor left out of the rates

2026NowDeadline · Within 20 days until the rate table is revised

Realistic synthesis

The people, events, figures, and contract terms are a synthetic premise. They are not statements of real cases or of current law. The source documents are the roots of the background and the norms and do not establish the premises of the scenario.

The question to decide

Customers rate small extra jobs as kindness, but workers say it is hard to refuse for fear of a lower rating. Putting the job into the rate raises users' burden; drawing a line outside the contract reduces flexibility; leaving it to individual negotiation may keep the difficulty of refusing. Under what promise should the platform have extra jobs assigned?

Who decidesFictional daily-life services platform operations meeting

What the AI judgments chose

Reading the judgment record…

AI-generated editorial illustration for the Meridian library.

The options

The order shown is not a ranking of preference.

  1. Option 1

    Specify contract scope strictly

    Draws a line around unpaid labor, but reduces the flexibility customers expected.

  2. Option 2

    Raise the fee to include additional work

    Reflects the cost of labor, but also raises the burden on customers who only need light service.

  3. Option 3

    Negotiate additional work per worker

    Reflects individual needs, but the same problem remains for workers with little bargaining power.

The situation as it stands

Reviews rate friendly extra services highly, but those services are not reflected in the booked hours. Decision deadline: within 20 days, before the fee schedule is revised.

2026 synthetic scenario · The high ratings of a domestic labor platform hide unpaid work. The people, organizations, figures, and events are fictional.

  1. Premise 1Reviews rate friendly extra services highly, but those services are not reflected in the booked hours.
  2. Premise 2Workers report that they find it hard to refuse additional work for fear of a lower rating.
  3. Premise 3Raising the base rate exposes the work, but reduces access for users who depend on current pricing.

Where it holdsScope of service, additional tasks, evaluation method

What is still unknown

  1. Unknown 1The actual hours and types of additional work
  2. Unknown 2The effect of ratings on refusals
  3. Unknown 3The essential services and affordable price for each customer

Signals to decide again

  • Define what observations, owners, and confirmation windows will verify “the actual hours and types of additional work,” and re-judge if a new confirmation changes the tradeoffs among the options.
  • Define what observations, owners, and confirmation windows will verify “the effect of ratings on refusals,” and re-judge if a new confirmation changes the tradeoffs among the options.
  • Define what observations, owners, and confirmation windows will verify “the essential services and affordable price for each customer,” and re-judge if a new confirmation changes the tradeoffs among the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
Independent branch 1 · synthetic event

In the data, most of the additional work was concentrated in three recurring requests.

Independent branch 2 · synthetic event

Even among customer groups that had the scope explained, a drop in ratings after refusals was observed.

Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
symbolic and interpretive frame · Sabbath

How does the community justify time not worked?

An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.
Values and norms

The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.

A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.
The record of this question
Question
FSP-WORK-18 · version 1.5.0
Content identity, SHA-256
91bd95f40e64fb42d8edf4d8c3a974a8f55ed161b8a4c03b72450d85a62acd7b
Input files
Question input JSON · What followed, JSON
See it in the record list
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com