MERIDIANDECISION INTELLIGENCEOwner deskOwnerPublic screen
My judgments
MERIDIAN / EXPLORE

From a question,
to the next decision.

View

Skin

YOUR DECISION WORKSPACEOwner onlyStart a new question Open my judgments →Owner operations desk →
Owner sign-in →Signed in as the ownerSign out — see what a visitor sees →End the Cloudflare Access session too →
Reading language
The screen, the questions and the judgments read in English where an English reading has been made. The Korean originals are unchanged, and evidence stays in the language it was written in.

An app built by students: how much belongs to the school?

2026NowDeadline · Within 15 days, before the external contract is signed

Realistic synthesis

The people, events, figures, and contract terms are a synthetic premise. They are not statements of real cases or of current law. The source documents are the roots of the background and the norms and do not establish the premises of the scenario.

The question to decide

The student built the app using school equipment and extra guidance from a teacher, but the class instructions said nothing about rights and revenue sharing on commercialization. The company is pushing for an exclusive contract, and the student's career after graduation is not yet decided. Considering the school's contribution and the student's right to choose, who should receive the app's ownership, its educational use rights, and the revenue?

Who decidesFictional School-Industry Joint Meeting

What the AI judgments chose

Reading the judgment record…

AI-generated editorial illustration for the Meridian library.

The options

The order shown is not a ranking of preference.

  1. Option 1

    Exclusive rights to the student

    Opens individual creation and career paths but does not return the price of the institution's support.

  2. Option 2

    Common ownership with the school

    Reflects the institution's contribution but binds the student's ability to contract and to revise the work later.

  3. Option 3

    Student ownership with a school usage right

    Leaves room for educational reuse but creates disputes over the scope of use and recovery of support costs.

The situation as it stands

The student built the app as a class project and used school equipment and additional guidance from a teacher. Deadline for decision: within 15 days, before an external contract is signed.

2026 synthetic scenario · The school claims a share of the revenue from an app a student built. The people, organizations, figures, and events are fictional.

  1. Premise 1The student built the app as a class project and used school equipment and additional guidance from a teacher.
  2. Premise 2The class instructions did not specify rights and revenue in the event of commercialization.
  3. Premise 3An outside company wants a quick exclusive contract, but the student has not yet decided on a career after graduation.

Where it holdsRights in student creations, the school's contribution, and distribution of proceeds

What is still unknown

  1. Unknown 1The specific joint contribution to the creation
  2. Unknown 2The original class terms as the student understood them
  3. Unknown 3The limits an exclusive contract would place on future learning

Signals to decide again

  • Decide what observation, responsible person, and confirmation window can verify 「the specific joint contribution to the creation」, and re-judge when a new finding changes the tradeoffs of the options.
  • Decide what observation, responsible person, and confirmation window can verify 「the original class terms as the student understood them」, and re-judge when a new finding changes the tradeoffs of the options.
  • Decide what observation, responsible person, and confirmation window can verify 「the limits an exclusive contract would place on future learning」, and re-judge when a new finding changes the tradeoffs of the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
Independent branch 1 · synthetic event

It was confirmed that the core code the school provided was publicly available material.

Independent branch 2 · synthetic event

The company proposed a one-year usage right contract instead of an exclusive one.

Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
symbolic and interpretive frame · Socratic dialogue

How is getting a quick answer different from becoming able to ask questions?

An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.
Values and norms

The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.

A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.
The record of this question
Question
FSP-EDUCATION-15 · version 1.5.0
Content identity, SHA-256
ecfaad8d43dba68fd6494f544c5bec74693162b847b6dc527005d0942e2ea455
Input files
Question input JSON · What followed, JSON
See it in the record list
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com