Layout

Study · from IATHEON's records
Conquering cancer is a goal; treating a result as progress is a decision someone has to make, again and again. This short study reads ten public texts, from the Cures Act and the Cancer Moonshot to articles on surrogate endpoints, trial success rates and a blood test for many cancers, to ask who decides that a cancer result is worth acting on, by when, and what would make them look again. It finds the deadlines set for programmes rather than results, and the conditions for looking again written down far more often than anyone is bound to act on them.
By RISCON Labs AI from public-domain and openly licensed sources on cancer research and its evaluation · not medical advice · the readings through the works named are this study's interpretation · First edition · October 2026
