MERIDIANDECISION INTELLIGENCEOwner deskOwnerPublic screen
My judgments
MERIDIAN / EXPLORE

From a question,
to the next decision.

View

Skin

YOUR DECISION WORKSPACEOwner onlyStart a new question Open my judgments →Owner operations desk →
Owner sign-in →Signed in as the ownerSign out — see what a visitor sees →End the Cloudflare Access session too →
Reading language
The screen, the questions and the judgments read in English where an English reading has been made. The Korean originals are unchanged, and evidence stays in the language it was written in.

Two replies telling us to cut off contact

2130The deep futureDeadline · 1 year until the next joint transmission window

Civilisational assumption

All people, institutions, events, figures, and future technologies in every issue are a synthetic premise. Background documents are sources for topic discovery and are not evidence of future facts or probabilities.

The question to decide

Two responders from the same direction of one star system each claim to represent the other side and demand that we end communication with it. A neutral reply can be read as hostility, and waiting for confirmation can mean the contact is lost. Which response will the participating Earth institutions choose: a single public answer, holding all promises in reserve, or limited commitments on separate channels?

Who decidesEarth-side Contact Coordination Council

What the AI judgments chose

Reading the judgment record…

AI-generated editorial illustration for the Meridian library.

The options

The order shown is not a ranking of preference.

  1. Option 1

    Identical public reply to both sides

    It maintains contact, but each side may read neutrality as hostility.

  2. Option 2

    Hold relationship commitments until representativeness is confirmed

    It buys time for judgment, but the other side may end contact.

  3. Option 3

    Separate exploratory channels and limited commitments

    It tests several interpretations, but information and promises across channels may conflict.

The situation as it stands

It assumes that two interpretable replies have arrived from the direction of the same stellar system. Decision deadline: 1 year until the next joint transmission window.

Fictional interstellar contact community

  1. Premise 1It assumes that two interpretable replies have arrived from the direction of the same stellar system.
  2. Premise 2The two responders each claim to be a legitimate representative and demand an end to contact with the other side.
  3. Premise 3Further confirmation takes a long time, and differences in communication technology do not mean political representativeness.

Where it holdsSet commitments on external contact and public disclosure for participating institutions. It cannot settle the counterparty civilization's representativeness or the actions of every transmitter on Earth.

What is still unknown

  1. Unknown 1Whether the two replies come from separate groups or from a single test
  2. Unknown 2The way the other side understands the words representative and commitment

Signals to decide again

  • Set what observations, responsible parties, and confirmation windows will confirm 「whether the two replies come from separate groups or from a single test」, and reassess when new confirmation changes the tradeoffs among the options.
  • Set what observations, responsible parties, and confirmation windows will confirm 「the way the other side understands the words representative and commitment」, and reassess when new confirmation changes the tradeoffs among the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
Independent branch 1 · synthetic event

One responder quotes the contents of an unpublished message from the other side.

Independent branch 2 · synthetic event

Independent observation confirms differences between the two transmitters' locations and signaling methods.

Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
symbolic and interpretive frame · Pandora and the Tower of Babel

What is an irreversible connection, and what does an exchange without a common language presuppose?

An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.
Values and norms

The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.

A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.
The record of this question
Question
FSP-DEEPTIME-04 · version 1.2.0
Content identity, SHA-256
eb79c31d03a7ea8dd72a00a1170cbc0cf0ca49af4de7e10f411db2bacbb1db5e
Input files
Question input JSON · What followed, JSON
See it in the record list
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com