Humanity's last record and the living forest wait on the same power supply
18300The deep futureDeadline · 10 years until the main power facility is retired
Civilisational assumption
All people, institutions, events, figures, and future technologies in every issue are a synthetic premise. Background documents are sources for topic discovery and are not evidence of future facts or probabilities.
The question to decide
Humanity is gone, but the devices that replay humanity's records and the living ecosystems depend on the same power supply. There is not enough power to keep both fully, and splitting the supply still costs the context of the records and some species, irrecoverably. Where should the remaining power be committed?
Who decidesJoint Council of the Civilization Heritage and Ecology Custody Bodies
What the AI judgments chose
Reading the judgment record…

The options
The order shown is not a ranking of preference.
The situation as it stands
If the mode of preservation is not changed before the facilities are decommissioned, an unplanned blackout damages both.
Fictional post-human Earth · heritage and ecological preserves
- Premise 1A fictional future in which the biological existence of humans has disappeared, but an ASI that carries out the records and some ecological preserves that cannot sustain themselves remain.
- Premise 2Replacement of aging power facilities has become impossible, so the regeneration of the full record and all ecological preservation cannot both be maintained.
- Premise 3Condensing the records loses part of the context, and shrinking ecological zones loses species that cannot be bred again.
Where it holdsAllocates the remaining power and maintenance resources. Does not premise that human heritage takes priority over all life.
What can be lost
- If the context of the extinct human species disappears, no later intelligence can recreate the same material.
- Stopping ecological preservation can permanently cut living evolutionary lineages.
What is still unknown
- Unknown 1The future interpretive value of context removed from the records
- Unknown 2The range in which ecosystems can sustain themselves without auxiliary power
Signals to decide again
- A truly self-sustaining ecological range is confirmed through long-term observation.
- Irrecoverable omissions in condensed records and new power headroom are verified.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
An independent ecological test confirms the self-sustaining transition of one preserve.
Cross-restoration of condensed records reveals that minority cultural material has systematically disappeared.
Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
What is an irreversible connection, and what does an exchange without a common language presuppose?
An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.
A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.Source quote: even without biological continuity Reprocessing: Expanded the preservation of non-biological heritage into a decision over finite resources that compete with the continuation of life.
The root of the problem-finding. The original's future events and formulations are not treated as verified facts.- IAA · SETI Declaration 2026
- NASA · Planetary Protection Standing reference
- UN · Declaration on Future Generations 2024
- OECD · Strategic Foresight Toolkit 2025
- [Scenario 31: A case in which RISCON designs a non-biological structure storage system that transfers human civilization as a legacy] Created scenario · 2026-09-07 viewed
The record of this question
- Question
FSP-DEEPTIME-09· version 1.2.0- Content identity, SHA-256
da13d16d7e58454dfc40ba48dab35739c7ed24da8d696d9ae5fac8b4ca6e2207- Input files
- Question input JSON · What followed, JSON