MERIDIANDECISION INTELLIGENCEOwner deskOwnerPublic screen
My judgments
MERIDIAN / EXPLORE

From a question,
to the next decision.

View

Skin

YOUR DECISION WORKSPACEOwner onlyStart a new question Open my judgments →Owner operations desk →
Owner sign-in →Signed in as the ownerSign out — see what a visitor sees →End the Cloudflare Access session too →
Reading language
The screen, the questions and the judgments read in English where an English reading has been made. The Korean originals are unchanged, and evidence stays in the language it was written in.

Is there a Veto over a 20-second budget?

2037The middle futureDeadline · Decision deadline: within 30 days

A leap assumed

All people, institutions, events, figures, and future technologies in every issue are a synthetic premise. Background documents are sources for topic discovery and are not evidence of future facts or probabilities.

The question to decide

The ASI explains that interlocked budget bills lapse every 20 seconds. Waiting for human review delays new projects, and handing them over as a bundle means accepting the losses within. In what units and on what cycle should the parliament approve the quarterly budget of 40 trillion won to exercise a substantive Veto?

Who decidesParliamentary Budget Procedure Committee

What the AI judgments chose

Reading the judgment record…

AI-generated editorial illustration for the Meridian library.

The options

The order shown is not a ranking of preference.

  1. Option 1

    Confirm after human review

    Keeps the explicit right of deliberation, but cannot keep up with the refresh rate, and new execution is delayed.

  2. Option 2

    Delegation within a pre-set scope

    Gains consistency in execution, but has to accept losses within the scope in advance.

  3. Option 3

    Weekly approval and sample review

    Buys time for review, but may miss chain effects outside the sample.

The situation as it stands

The fictional ASI explains that it refreshes mutually dependent budget allocations every 20 seconds, and that each plan is valid for 20 seconds. Deadline: within 30 days.

Fictional future · a public budget package that must be vetoed within 20 seconds

  1. Premise 1The fictional ASI explains that it refreshes mutually dependent budget allocations every 20 seconds, and that each plan is valid for 20 seconds.
  2. Premise 2If the legislature amends one project, the allocations of 600 other projects change, so deliberating them one by one does not show the overall effect.
  3. Premise 3Even without starting automatic execution, existing statutory spending can continue for 90 days, but new projects are delayed.

Where it holdsHow to deliberate the quarterly budget of KRW 40 trillion and the ceiling on automatic execution

What is still unknown

  1. Unknown 1Whether the 20-second validity is a necessary constraint or a design choice
  2. Unknown 2The verifiability of the minimum services to be protected within the package
  3. Unknown 3The time citizens and legislators need to understand the total loss

Signals to decide again

  • Specify the observation, the responsible party, and the confirmation window that can verify 'whether the 20-second validity is a necessary constraint or a design choice', and re-judge when a new verification changes the tradeoffs of the options.
  • Specify the observation, the responsible party, and the confirmation window that can verify 'the verifiability of the minimum services to be protected within the package', and re-judge when a new verification changes the tradeoffs of the options.
  • Specify the observation, the responsible party, and the confirmation window that can verify 'the time citizens and legislators need to understand the total loss', and re-judge when a new verification changes the tradeoffs of the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
Independent branch 1 · synthetic event

In a simulated run that slowed the refresh cycle to one day, the reduction in predicted benefit was almost nil.

Independent branch 2 · synthetic event

A plan was found under which transit support for two regions left out of the sample review disappeared at the same time.

Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
symbolic and interpretive frame · Athenian sortition

Which is the basis of representation: expertise, majority, or random selection?

An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.
Values and norms

The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.

A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.
The record of this question
Question
FSP-DEMOCRACY-14 · version 1.3.0
Content identity, SHA-256
f980a46ecf88cbf64c3c26ecbc482eff2d3be6f55e0b609afea377fba66d8acb
Input files
Question input JSON · What followed, JSON
See it in the record list
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com