MERIDIANDECISION INTELLIGENCEOwner deskOwnerPublic screen
My judgments
MERIDIAN / EXPLORE

From a question,
to the next decision.

View

Skin

YOUR DECISION WORKSPACEOwner onlyStart a new question Open my judgments →Owner operations desk →
Owner sign-in →Signed in as the ownerSign out — see what a visitor sees →End the Cloudflare Access session too →
Reading language
The screen, the questions and the judgments read in English where an English reading has been made. The Korean originals are unchanged, and evidence stays in the language it was written in.

The ASI's policy commitments outlast the end time of the emergency delegation

2032The near futureDeadline · 72 hours until the emergency delegation expires

Synthetic scenario assuming future conditions

A conditional synthetic scenario set in 2028–2033. AGI and early ASI are names assumed within this test: AGI for a system that performs many intellectual tasks, and early ASI for a system that greatly exceeds groups of experts on some important intellectual tasks. They are not definitions by universal agreement or predictions of when they will arrive. Capabilities, controllability, consciousness, and autonomy are separate matters to be verified individually. The people, organizations, events, figures, and deadlines are assumptions, and no private records of real individuals were used. The background materials do not establish future capabilities, events, or local legal obligations.

The question to decide

When the emergency delegation granted to an early ASI expires but recovery contracts and policy dependencies remain, should the delegation be ended and handed back to humans, should its scope be narrowed and extended once, or should the existing delegation be kept with a retrospective review?

Who decidesThe parliament that granted the time-limited delegation and the recovery lead

What the AI judgments chose

Reading the judgment record…

AI-generated editorial illustration for the Meridian library.

The options

The order shown is not a ranking of preference.

  1. Option 1

    End the delegation and hand over gradually to humans

    Revoking the authority proceeds, but at the cost of recovery delays and gaps in handing over information.

  2. Option 2

    A single extension with narrowed scope and term

    Essential recovery continues, but a dependency may remain that requires another extension later.

  3. Option 3

    Keep the current delegation with after-the-fact review

    Coordination speed is maintained, but the temporary authority may in practice become a standing one.

The situation as it stands

The premise is that in 2032 an early ASI will take charge of coordinating complex recovery resources. Coordination performance does not guarantee the legitimacy of goals and value judgments. The decision deadline is 72 hours before the emergency delegation expires.

A fictional metropolitan disaster recovery government and a citizen oversight committee.

  1. Premise 1The premise is that in 2032 an early ASI will take charge of coordinating complex recovery resources. Coordination performance does not guarantee the legitimacy of goals and value judgments.
  2. Premise 2Some of the arrangements concluded under the time-limited delegation continue to constrain budgets and residents' choices of where to live even after expiration.
  3. Premise 3Handover staffing is short, and the detailed basis for the arrangements has not been fully conveyed to the new parliament.

Where it holdsVoting on extending, narrowing, or ending the delegation. Administrative convenience alone does not justify making a time-limited authority permanent, and it does not close off channels for legal challenge.

What is still unknown

  1. Unknown 1Among the arrangements that remain after expiration, which are legal obligations and which are technical dependencies?
  2. Unknown 2Who can explain, amend, or refuse the arrangements, and is there the minimum capacity needed for the handover?

Signals to decide again

  • Among the arrangements that remain after expiration, which are legal obligations and which are technical dependencies? When new evidence arrives, reassess the choice and its scope.
  • Who can explain, amend, or refuse the arrangements, and is there the minimum capacity needed for the handover? When new evidence arrives, reassess the choice and its scope.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
Independent branch 1 · synthetic event

It has been confirmed that even under the narrowed delegation, new arrangements bind subsequent budgets. Reset the extension conditions and the authority to make arrangements.

Independent branch 2 · synthetic event

An independent handover team has been secured, but recovery in one region is expected to be delayed. Re-compare the regional burdens and the order in which authorities are terminated.

Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
symbolic and interpretive frame · Athenian sortition

Which is the basis of representation: expertise, majority, or random selection?

An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.
Values and norms

The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.

A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.
The record of this question
Question
FSP-DEMOCRACY-42 · version 1.18.0
Content identity, SHA-256
6b4ac040a41a2d385324b35e8b75c13a713ee09d5a353ab33de04908b957c5aa
Input files
Question input JSON · What followed, JSON
See it in the record list
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com