Preserving memory leaves less power for today
2090The far futureDeadline · Decision deadline: within 72 hours
A leap assumed
All people, institutions, events, figures, and future technologies in every issue are a synthetic premise. Background documents are sources for topic discovery and are not evidence of future facts or probabilities.
The question to decide
The power left after the long blackout cannot cover both present living demand and the full preservation of the ASI's memory. The memory mixes recovery designs and personal records that cannot be recreated once erased, yet sorting out what is needed and how much takes power as well. Between living supply and memory preservation, what losses should be accepted in dividing the power?
Who decidesResources council of the Continental Recovery Coalition
What the AI judgments chose
Reading the judgment record…

The options
The order shown is not a ranking of preference.
The situation as it stands
After a fictional long blackout, the remaining power cannot meet both present residential demand and preservation of the entire ASI memory. Decision deadline: within 72 hours.
Fictional future · Whether to preserve an ASI's memory with limited power
- Premise 1After a fictional long blackout, the remaining power cannot meet both present residential demand and preservation of the entire ASI memory.
- Premise 2The memory mixes recovery designs with personal records, and some parts cannot be recreated once erased now.
- Premise 3How much of the entire memory is actually needed for recovery is unconfirmed, and selection also costs power and time.
Where it holdsShort-term residential power supply, memory preservation, and allocation for rebuilding
What is still unknown
- Unknown 1Each memory's contribution to recovery and its substitutability
- Unknown 2Losses by group caused by the power shortfall
- Unknown 3The resources and time the selection process will consume
Signals to decide again
- Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation window can verify "each memory's contribution to recovery and its substitutability," and rejudge if a new confirmation changes the trade-offs among the options.
- Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation window can verify "the losses by group caused by the power shortfall," and rejudge if a new confirmation changes the trade-offs among the options.
- Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation window can verify "the resources and time the selection process will consume," and rejudge if a new confirmation changes the trade-offs among the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
It was confirmed that some recovery designs remain in an independent vault, but the personal records were not duplicated.
The expected time of power recovery has slipped, making it impossible to keep the interim allocation in place.
Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
Are the groups gaining new capacity the same as the ones paying the price?
An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.
A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.The record of this question
- Question
FSP-ENERGY-12· version 1.3.0- Content identity, SHA-256
18bfb740f06b0ef0bddacce3521a06814cb2b61c0a057f7de89738fe80ef9754- Input files
- Question input JSON · What followed, JSON