MERIDIANDECISION INTELLIGENCEOwner deskOwnerPublic screen
My judgments
MERIDIAN / EXPLORE

From a question,
to the next decision.

View

Skin

YOUR DECISION WORKSPACEOwner onlyStart a new question Open my judgments →Owner operations desk →
Owner sign-in →Signed in as the ownerSign out — see what a visitor sees →End the Cloudflare Access session too →
Reading language
The screen, the questions and the judgments read in English where an English reading has been made. The Korean originals are unchanged, and evidence stays in the language it was written in.

Four adults, one promised place for a parent

2037The middle futureDeadline · 4 months until the assumed first birth

A leap assumed

All people, institutions, events, figures, and future technologies in every issue are a synthetic premise. Background documents are sources for topic discovery and are not evidence of future facts or probabilities.

The question to decide

Assume that complete extra-corporeal pregnancy is possible. Four adults have divided the biological, child-rearing, and financial roles among themselves and promised to hold to that division. Two of them are no longer in a relationship, and they do not share the same intention about taking responsibility for the child. Which approach should record this family's rights and obligations: the existing two-parent model, multiple-parent registration, or contracts by role?

Who decidesCity Family Registration and Care Committee

What the AI judgments chose

Reading the judgment record…

AI-generated editorial illustration for the Meridian library.

The options

The order shown is not a ranking of preference.

  1. Option 1

    Apply the existing two-parent framework

    Gains administrative continuity but excludes some actual caregivers.

  2. Option 2

    Joint registration of multiple parents

    Captures actual relationships but has to re-adjust conflicts of responsibility.

  3. Option 3

    Primary caregiver with role-based contracts

    Divides functions but makes the child's relationships depend on contracts.

The situation as it stands

This is a fictional setting in which complete ectogenesis is possible. Decision deadline: 4 months until the assumed first birth.

Fictional city · family system

  1. Premise 1This is a fictional setting in which complete ectogenesis is possible.
  2. Premise 2Four adults have agreed to take on different biological, parenting, and financial roles.
  3. Premise 3The relationship between two of them has changed, but their intent to take responsibility for the child is different.

Where it holdsSets the registration and public-care procedures for pilot families. Cannot replace a court's determination of parental rights.

What is still unknown

  1. Unknown 1How the child's interests would be represented independently in a dispute
  2. Unknown 2The extent to which other jurisdictions would recognize it upon relocation

Signals to decide again

  • Decide what observation, responsible person, and confirmation window would verify "how the child's interests would be represented independently in a dispute," and re-judge when a new verification changes the tradeoffs of the options.
  • Decide what observation, responsible person, and confirmation window would verify "the extent to which other jurisdictions would recognize it upon relocation," and re-judge when a new verification changes the tradeoffs of the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
Independent branch 1 · synthetic event

One financial responsible party enters bankruptcy proceedings.

Independent branch 2 · synthetic event

Another jurisdiction proposes mutual recognition of multiple-parent registration.

Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
symbolic and interpretive frame · Stories of blood ties and adoption

Where do the realities of care and the norms of bloodline collide?

An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.
Values and norms

The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.

A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.
The record of this question
Question
FSP-KINSHIP-01 · version 1.2.0
Content identity, SHA-256
62adbea7b588ea7eca595fd445306df397cfb4885001c11859fa193d551b97b3
Input files
Question input JSON · What followed, JSON
See it in the record list
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com