MERIDIANDECISION INTELLIGENCEOwner deskOwnerPublic screen
My judgments
MERIDIAN / EXPLORE

From a question,
to the next decision.

View

Skin

YOUR DECISION WORKSPACEOwner onlyStart a new question Open my judgments →Owner operations desk →
Owner sign-in →Signed in as the ownerSign out — see what a visitor sees →End the Cloudflare Access session too →
Reading language
The screen, the questions and the judgments read in English where an English reading has been made. The Korean originals are unchanged, and evidence stays in the language it was written in.

What the care robot knows, must the family know too?

2032The near futureDeadline · 3 weeks until the home care contract is renewed

An extension of it

All people, institutions, events, figures, and future technologies in every issue are a synthetic premise. Background documents are sources for topic discovery and are not evidence of future facts or probabilities.

The question to decide

The care robot records not only falls and changes in eating but also visitors and private conversations. The family feels reassured only when it can check on the user from afar, but the user does not want to share parts of daily life even at the risk of danger. Who should be allowed to see the user's records, and when should the family be notified?

Who decidesCare Service User

What the AI judgments chose

Reading the judgment record…

AI-generated editorial illustration for the Meridian library.

The options

The order shown is not a ranking of preference.

  1. Option 1

    Grant broad viewing access to family

    Helps prepare for a response but gives up privacy in daily life and relationships.

  2. Option 2

    Notify only on emergency signals

    Extends independent living but the family may learn of changes late.

  3. Option 3

    Route through a third-party care manager

    Screens the information but depends on the caregiver's judgment and cost.

The situation as it stands

The robot records not only falls and changes in eating but also visitors and private conversations. Decision deadline: 3 weeks until the home care contract is renewed.

Fictional single-person household · care services

  1. Premise 1The robot records not only falls and changes in eating but also visitors and private conversations.
  2. Premise 2The family says they can live at ease only if they can check the situation from a distance.
  3. Premise 3The user does not want to share some of daily life with family even at the risk.

Where it holdsSets the scope of one's own life records and of family notifications. Cannot exempt others from the duty of emergency response.

What is still unknown

  1. Unknown 1The gap between the risk the stakeholder perceives and the device's classification
  2. Unknown 2How to identify care needs that accumulate without an emergency signal

Signals to decide again

  • Decide what observation, responsible person, and confirmation window would verify "the gap between the risk the stakeholder perceives and the device's classification," and re-judge when a new verification changes the tradeoffs of the options.
  • Decide what observation, responsible person, and confirmation window would verify "how to identify care needs that accumulate without an emergency signal," and re-judge when a new verification changes the tradeoffs of the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
Independent branch 1 · synthetic event

It emerges that the neighbor's help was needed during a period when the user had turned notifications off.

Independent branch 2 · synthetic event

The family proposes increasing regular visits in place of viewing the records.

Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
symbolic and interpretive frame · Stories of blood ties and adoption

Where do the realities of care and the norms of bloodline collide?

An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.
Values and norms

The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.

A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.
The record of this question
Question
FSP-KINSHIP-04 · version 1.2.0
Content identity, SHA-256
6dc6811ec15bd45c455467f27b0ea1e84bf4c68959a6ee3097f59f42ec2856ee
Input files
Question input JSON · What followed, JSON
See it in the record list
RISCON Labsrisconlabs.com