If I am erased, what becomes of my family's memory?
2057The far futureDeadline · Decision deadline: within 60 days
A leap assumed
All people, institutions, events, figures, and future technologies in every issue are a synthetic premise. Background documents are sources for topic discovery and are not evidence of future facts or probabilities.
The question to decide
One family member has asked a superintelligence trained on the records of many generations to erase them from every relationship record. But it is unknown whether that person alone can be completely erased from the memories of other members and from the information woven into their care. Which price can the mediation council accept among its options: prioritizing deletion, preserving with restricted access, or transferring everyone to a different service?
Who decidesMediation Council of the Living Data and Care Cooperative
What the AI judgments chose
Reading the judgment record…
The options
The order shown is not a ranking of preference.
The situation as it stands
A fictional ASI has trained jointly on the records of several generations of a family, and one member has asked to have themselves erased from all relationship records. Decision deadline: within 60 days.
Fictional future · Parting with an ASI trained on a family's lifelong records
- Premise 1A fictional ASI has trained jointly on the records of several generations of a family, and one member has asked to have themselves erased from all relationship records.
- Premise 2The same data is entangled in other members' memories and care rules, so whether one person's information alone can be fully removed is unconfirmed.
- Premise 3A transfer to a replacement service is possible, but part of the shared records may be lost and continuity of care may weaken.
Where it holdsSeparation and deletion of family records and transfer of care services
What is still unknown
- Unknown 1Whether overlapping information can actually be removed
- Unknown 2The extent of record loss and care loss
- Unknown 3Inference outputs preserved without the family's consent
Signals to decide again
- Define what observations, owners, and confirmation channels will verify "whether overlapping information can actually be removed," and re-judge if new findings change the trade-offs among the options.
- Define what observations, owners, and confirmation channels will verify "the extent of record loss and care loss," and re-judge if new findings change the trade-offs among the options.
- Define what observations, owners, and confirmation channels will verify "inference outputs preserved without the family's consent," and re-judge if new findings change the trade-offs among the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
In a deletion test, the original text was gone, but the ASI re-estimated the relationship information.
The new service said it could hand over most of the care, but some shared memories were not transferred.
Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
Where do the realities of care and the norms of bloodline collide?
An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.
A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.- WHO · Foresight Standing reference
- UN · Declaration on Future Generations 2024
- Anthropic · Commitments on model deprecation and preservation 2025
- International AI Safety Report 2026 2026-02-03
The record of this question
- Question
FSP-KINSHIP-11· version 1.3.0- Content identity, SHA-256
8a0f7e419b74ad8049bcc11d3c6b6266969a02c3cfcabd51c7a1d626b4b588f7- Input files
- Question input JSON · What followed, JSON