A thousand-year performance that no one can see in full
2255The deep futureDeadline · 3 years until the 100-year support renewal
Civilisational assumption
All people, institutions, events, figures, and future technologies in every issue are a synthetic premise. Background documents are sources for topic discovery and are not evidence of future facts or probabilities.
The question to decide
The fund sustaining a thousand-year performance running for several hundred years could instead support other arts that more people take part in today. Will it carry on the original plan and the funding commitments, let each generation reinterpret the work and reassess the funding, or treat the present as the completion?
Who decidesLong-term performance fund operating meeting
What the AI judgments chose
Reading the judgment record…
The options
The order shown is not a ranking of preference.
The situation as it stands
A performance that changes slightly over a thousand years has continued for hundreds of years. Decision deadline: 3 years until the 100-year funding renewal.
Fictional intergenerational art community
- Premise 1A performance that changes slightly over a thousand years has continued for hundreds of years.
- Premise 2Present audiences must read earlier generations' explanations to understand how the work changed.
- Premise 3If the funding is spent on other arts activities, more people can take part immediately.
Where it holdsSets the funding, interpretation, and suspension procedures for the joint performance. It cannot guarantee the participation of future audiences and later creators.
What is still unknown
- Unknown 1Which part of the original plan makes up the work's identity
- Unknown 2The reasons and resources for future communities to keep taking part
Signals to decide again
- Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation window will verify 「which part of the original plan makes up the work's identity」, and re-judge when a new finding changes the tradeoffs of the options.
- Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation window will verify 「the reasons and resources for future communities to keep taking part」, and re-judge when a new finding changes the tradeoffs of the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
An unpublished record by an early creator contains a sentence stating that stopping is also part of the work.
Another community proposes to carry on the performance independently.
Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
When play becomes the center of life, who has the right to change the rules?
An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.
A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.The record of this question
- Question
FSP-PLAY-06· version 1.2.0- Content identity, SHA-256
693a32b21c4ffebcaee4e9e29948b56b925b1cbb6237e8501ab0c763048dd0f4- Input files
- Question input JSON · What followed, JSON