Even if it replaces the work, can it replace belonging?
2052The far futureDeadline · Decision deadline: within 180 days
A leap assumed
All people, institutions, events, figures, and future technologies in every issue are a synthetic premise. Background documents are sources for topic discovery and are not evidence of future facts or probabilities.
The question to decide
If Superintelligent AI can perform 800,000 public-sector jobs, redirecting the budget to transition income and training may still not carry over the belonging of a job and local relationships. How should the citizens' committee divide the budget among existing employment, income guarantees, and people's roles in disaster response, care, and similar areas, and how far should the right not to participate be guaranteed?
Who decidesCitizens' committee on public employment transition
What the AI judgments chose
Reading the judgment record…
The options
The order shown is not a ranking of preference.
The situation as it stands
A fictional ASI can replace much of public administration, but people's jobs and local relationships are also expected to shrink. Deadline for decision: Deadline for decision: within 180 days.
Fictional future · whether to keep 800,000 public roles that a fictional ASI would replace
- Premise 1A fictional ASI can replace much of public administration, but people's jobs and local relationships are also expected to shrink.
- Premise 2There is a budget plan showing that the same budget can either keep 70% of existing roles or provide 3 years of transition income and autonomous education.
- Premise 3Manual operating capacity may be needed in a disaster, but which roles to keep and what training is actually required have not been decided.
Where it holds3-year budget for public roles, transition income, and human operating capacity
What is still unknown
- Unknown 1The effects of job loss beyond income
- Unknown 2Human operating capacity actually needed in an emergency
- Unknown 3Stakeholder preferences regarding autonomous education and new roles
Signals to decide again
- Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation window exist for "the effects of job loss beyond income", and re-judge when new confirmation changes the cost of the options.
- Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation window exist for "human operating capacity actually needed in an emergency", and re-judge when new confirmation changes the cost of the options.
- Decide what observation, owner, and confirmation window exist for "Stakeholder preferences regarding autonomous education and new roles", and re-judge when new confirmation changes the cost of the options.
Where the paths partNot answers — paths that part from the same starting point
A survey found that income was maintained in the pilot region, but isolation and gaps in local care increased.
In an emergency drill, results were submitted showing that most of the restructured roles were not used in the actual recovery.
Material and rootsThe frame, the values and the background documents
How does the community justify time not worked?
An exploratory perspective chosen by the creator. Does not claim supernatural validity or the superiority of any particular option.The benefits and costs of the options accrue to different stakeholders. Which loss to accept remains undecided.
A subject for the decision-maker to argue over; the materials carry no conclusion of their own.The record of this question
- Question
FSP-WORK-11· version 1.3.0- Content identity, SHA-256
39037b13644827a409e6cc1787ba5d1681b2e7fb81add814f9e5a15a2790a906- Input files
- Question input JSON · What followed, JSON